oa Devotional Reflections by Marvellous Mirrors

References

1. Andriessen, J., ‘Leven en werk van Joannes David s.j. 1546-1613’, in: West-Vlaanderen12 (1963), 220-224.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aguilonius, Franciscus, Opticorum libri sex philosophis juxta ac mathematicis utiles. Antwerp: Officina Plantiniana, widow and sons of Jan (I) Moretus, 1613.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Akbari, Suzanne Conklin, Seeing through the veil. Optical theory and Medieval allegory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ashworth, William B., ‘Natural history and the emblematic world view’, in: DavidC. Lindberg, RobertS. Westman (eds.), Reappraisals of the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, 303-332.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bellot, Christoph, ‘Spiegel und Allegorie. Die „DVODECIM SPECVLA“ des Jan David SJ‘, in: WolfgangAugustyn, EckhardLeuschner (eds.), Kunst und Humanismus. Festschrift für Gosbert Schüßler zum 60. Geburtstag. Passau: Klinger, 2007, 401-454.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boersma, Hans, Seeing God. The beatific vision in Christian tradition. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2018.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bowen, Karen L., Imhof, Dirk, Christopher Plantin and engraved book illustrations in sixteenth-century Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Daly, Peter M., The emblem in Early Modern Europe. Contributions to the theory of the emblem. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Daly, Peter M., Dimler, G. Richard (eds.), The Jesuit series, vol. 1. Montreal: McGill- Queen’s University Press, 1997.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Daston, Lorraine, Park, Katharine, Wonders and the order of nature: 1150-1750. New York: Zone Books, 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Daum, Andreas W., ‘Varieties of popular science and the transformations of public knowledge some historical reflections’, in: Isis100 (2009), nr.2, 319-332.
    [Google Scholar]
12. David, Jan, Christeliicken waerseggher (…). Antwerp: Plantijnsche Druckerije, Jan (I) Moretus, 1602.
    [Google Scholar]
13. David, Jan, Duodecim specula Deum aliquando videre desideranti concinnata. Antwerp: Officina Plantiniana, Jan (I) Moretus, 1610.
    [Google Scholar]
14. David, Jan, Himmlische Kunstkammer (…). Munich: Nicolaus Hainricus, 1626.
    [Google Scholar]
15. David, Jan, Spiegel Kram (…). Munich: Nicolaus Heinricus, [1624].
    [Google Scholar]
16. [David, Jan], Vry-gheleyde tot ontlastinghe van conscientie om de catholiicke kercken, beelden, ende godtsdienst te gaen bekiicken. Antwerp: Joachim Trognesius, 1609.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dear, Peter, ‘Jesuit mathematical science and the reconstitution of experience in the early seventeenth century’, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science18 (1987), nr. 2, 133-175.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dekoninck, Ralph, Emblemata Sacra. Emblem books from the Maurits Sabbe Library, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Philadelphia: Saint Joseph’s University Press,2006.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Dekoninck, Ralph, ‘The Jesuit ars and scientia symbolica’, in: Wietsede Boer, KarlA.E. Enenkel [et al.] (eds.), Jesuit image theory. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2016, 74-88.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Dekoninck, Ralph, ‘Jesuit emblematics between theory and practice’, in: RobertA. Maryks (ed.), Jesuit historiography online, 2017. Accessed on 14 January 2021, dx.doi.org/10.1163/2468-7723_jho_COM_192540.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Dupré, Sven, Galileo, the telescope, and the science of optics in the sixteenth century. A case study of instrumental practice in art and science. PhD Thesis, Ghent University, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Dupré, Sven, ‘The historiography of perspective and reflexy-const in Netherlandish art’, in: Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art61 (2011), nr. 1, 34-61.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Dupré, Sven, ‘Visualization in Renaissance optics. The function of geometrical diagrams and pictures in the transmission of practical knowledge’, in: SachikoKusukawa, IanMaclean (eds.), Transmitting knowledge. Words, images, and instruments in Early Modern Europe. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2006, 11-39.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Genette, Gérard, Paratexts: thresholds of interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Giuliani, M., ‘Finding God in all things’, in: Finding God in all things. Essays in Ignatian spirituality selected from Christus. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company, 1958, 3-24.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Goldstein, Carl, ‘Popular science in Early Modern France. Abraham Bosse’s Sight’, in: Word & Image23 (2007), nr. 2, 182-194.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Graham, David, ‘Emblem, Renaissance origin of’, in: MarcoSgarbi (ed.), Encyclopedia of Renaissance philosophy. Cham: Springer, 2019, n.p.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Greene, Roland, Cushman, Stephen [et al.] (eds.), The Princeton Encyclopedia of poetry and poetics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hamburger, Jeffrey, ‘Speculations on speculation. Vision and perception in the theory and practice of mystical devotions’, in: WalterHaug, WolframSchneider-Lastin (eds.), Deutsche Mystik im abendländischen Zusammenhang. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2000, 353-408.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Held, Julius S., Rubens and the book. Title pages by Peter Paul Rubens. Williamstown, Mass.: Chapin Library, 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ilardi, Vincent, Renaissance vision from spectacles to telescopes. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Jorink, Eric, Het ‘Boeck der Natuere’. Nederlandse geleerden en de wonderen van Gods schepping1575-1715. Leiden: Primavera Pers, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kepler, Johannes, Ad Vitellionem paralipomena quibus astronomiae pars optica traditur. Frankfurt: Claude de Marne and heirs of Johann Aubry, 1604.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Knorr, Wilbur, ‘The geometry of burning mirrors in antiquity’, in: Isis74 (1983), nr. 1, 53-74.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kupfer, Marcia, Art and optics in the Hereford map. An English Mappa Mundi, c. 1300. New Haven/London: Yale University Press, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lindberg, David C., Theories of vision from Al-kindi to Kepler. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, 1976.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lindberg, David C., ‘The genesis of Kepler’s theory of light. Light metaphysics from Plotinus to Kepler’, in: Osiris2 (1986), 4.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lindberg, David C., ‘The science of light and color, seeing and knowing’, in: DavidC. Lindberg, MichaelH. Shank (eds.), The Cambridge History of science, vol. 2. New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 485-511.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Mak, Bonnie, How the page matters. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Maurolico, Francesco, Photismi de lumini, et umbra. Naples: Tarquinio Longo, 1611.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Meertens, P.J., Letterkundig leven in Zeeland in de zestiende en de eerste helft der zeventiende eeuw. Amsterdam: N.V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij, 1943.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Melion, Walter S., Brusati, Celeste [et al.], ‘Scriptural authority in word and image’, in: CelesteBrusati, KarlA.E. Enenkel, WalterS. Melion (eds.), The authority of the word. Reflecting on image and text in Northern Europe, 1400-1700. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2012, 1-46.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Melion, Walter S., ‘Quid est sacramentum?’, in: Quid est sacramentum? Visual repre- sentation of sacred mysteries in Early Modern Europe, 1400-1700. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2020, 1-54.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Meskens, A., ‘The Jesuit mathematics school in Antwerp in the early seventeenth century’, in: The Seventeenth Century12 (1997), nr. 1, 11-22.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Middleton, W.E., ‘Archimedes Kircher, Buffon and the burning-mirrors’, in: Isis (1961), nr. 4, 534-543.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Montagne, Victor dela, ‘Een pamflet tegen pater Joannes David’, in: Verslagen en mededelingen van de Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie voor Taal- en Letterkunde (1908), 621-632.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Nader-Esfahani, Sanam, Knowledge and representation through Baroque eyes. Literature and optics in France and Italy ca. 1600-1640. PhD thesis, Harvard University, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Östling, Johan, Sandmo, Erling [et al.], ‘The history of knowledge and the circulation of knowledge’, in: JohanÖstling, ErlingSandmo [et al.] (eds.), Circulation of knowledge. Explorations in the history of knowledge. Lund: Nordic Academic Press, 2018, 9-33.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Praz, Mario, Studies in seventeenth-century imagery. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 1975.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Remmert, Volker, Picturing the scientific revolution. Title engravings in Early Modern scientific publications. Philadelphia: Saint Joseph’s University Press, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Renzi, Silvia de, ‘The birth and death of wonder. History and geography of Baroque science’, in: Metascience9 (2000), nr. 1, 5-11.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Rikken, Marrigje, Smith, Paul J., ‘Jan Brueghel’s Allegory of air (1621) from a natural historical perspective’, in: Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art61 (2011), nr. 1, 86-115.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Risner, Fredericus, Opticae thesaurus (…). Basel: Eusebius Episcopius, 1572.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Saunders, Corinne, ‘Affective reading. Chaucer, women, and romance’, in: The Chaucer Review (2016), 11-30.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Secord, James A., ‘Knowledge in transit’, in: Isis95 (2004) nr. 4, 654-672.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Sellink, Manfred, Philips Galle (1537-1612): engraver and print publisher in Haarlem and Antwerp PhD Thesis,. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Seneca, Lucius Annaeus, Natural questions. The complete works of Lucius Annaeus Seneca, Harry M.Hine (transl.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Simms, D.L., ‘Galen on Archimedes. Burning mirror or burning pitch?’ in: Technology and Culture32 (1991), nr. 1, 91-96.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Smith, A. Mark, From sight to light. The passage from ancient to modern optics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Smith, A. Mark, ‘Giambattista Della Porta’s theory of vision in De refractione of 1593: Sources, problems, implications’, in: AriannaBorrelli, GioraHon [et al.] (eds.), The optics of Giambattista Della Porta (ca. 1535-1615): a reassessment. Cham: Springer2017, 97-123.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Smith, A. Mark, ‘The roots and routes of optical lore in the later Middle Ages and Renaissance’, in: SvenDupré (ed.), Perspective as practice. Renaissance cultures of optics. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 2019, 241-258.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Sors, Anne-Katrin, Allegorische Andachtsbücher in Antwerpen. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Teellinck, Willem, Timotheus, ofte Ghetrouwe waerschouwinge, tegen het verdrietelijck begapen der afgoden, ende afgodischen dienst der papisten. 1609.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Waterschoot, Werner, ‘Joannes David editing Dvodecim Specvla’, in: J.Manning, M.van Vaeck (eds.), The Jesuits and the emblem tradition. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 1999, 353-364.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Willach, Rolf, ‘The long road to the invention of the telescope’, in: AlbertVan Helden, SvenDupré [et al.] (eds.), The origins of the telescope. Amsterdam: KNAW Press, 2010, 93-114.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Witelo, Vitellionis mathematici doctissimi peri optikes (…). Nuremberg: Johannes Petreius, 1535.