oa Wie verdient nog onze solidariteit?

References

1. Albrekt Larsen, C.(2006). The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: How welfare regimes influence public support. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andreß, H. J., & Heien, T.(2001). Four worlds of welfare state attitudes? A comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States. European Sociological Review, 17(4), 337-356.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arts, W., & Gelissen, J.(2001). Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter?Acta Sociologica, 44(4), 283-299.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blekesaune, M., & Quadagno, J.(2003). Public attitudes toward welfare state policies a comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review, 19(5), 415-427.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bovens, M., Dekker, P., & Tiemeijer, W.(2014). Gescheiden werelden? Een verkenning van sociaal-culturele tegenstellingen in Nederland. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau en Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bovens, M., & Wille, A.(2011). Diplomademocratie: Over de spanning tussen meritocratie en democratie. Amsterdam: Prometheus.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Buss, C., Ebbinghaus, B., & Naumann, E.(2017). Support for the conditionality of unemployment benefits in 23 European countries, 1990-2008. Pp. 167-188 in W.Van Oorschot, F.Roosma, B.Meuleman & T.Reeskens (Eds.), The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes on welfare deservingness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cook, F. L.(1979). Who should be helped? Public support for social services. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Coughlin, R.(1980). Ideology, public opinion and welfare policy; attitudes towards taxes and spending in industrial societies. Berkely: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. De Swaan, A.(1988). In care of the state: Health care, education, and welfare in Europe and the USA in the modern era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Edlund, J., & Svallfors, S.(2011). Cohort, class and attitudes to redistribution in two liberal welfare states: Britain and the United States, 1996-2006. Pp. 228-246 in P.Vanhuysse & A.Goerres (Eds.), Ageing Populations in Post-Industrial Democracies. Abington, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fridberg, T., & Ploug, N.(2000). Public attitudes to unemployment in different European welfare regimes. Pp. 334-350 in D.Gallie & S.Paugam (Eds.), Welfare regimes and the experience of unemployment in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gielens, E., Roosma, F., & Achterberg, P.(2019). Deservingness in the eye of the beholder: A vignette study on the moderating role of cultural profiles in supporting activation policies. International Journal of Social Welfare, 28(4).
    [Google Scholar]
14. Goerres, A., & Tepe, M.(2010). Age-based self-interest, intergenerational solidarity and the welfare state: A comparative analysis of older people's attitudes towards public childcare in 12 OECD countries. European Journal of Political Research, 49(6), 818-851.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Goul Andersen, J.(1999). Changing labour markets, new social divisions and welfare state support: Denmark in the 1990s. Pp. 13-33 in S.Svallfors & P.Taylor-Gooby (Eds.), The end of the welfare state? Responses to state retrenchment. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Inglehart, R.(1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. New York: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jeene, M., & Van Oorschot, W.(2013). The relative deservingness of the unemployed in the eyes of the European public. Pp. 95-116 in L.Halman & W.Arts (Eds.), Value contrasts and consensus in present-day Europe: Painting Europe's moral landscape. The Hague: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jeene, M., Van Oorschot, W., & Uunk, W.(2013). Popular criteria for the welfare deservingness of disability pensioners: The influence of structural and cultural factors. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 1103-1117.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jeene, M., Van Oorschot, W., & Uunk, W.(2014). The dynamics of welfare opinions in changing economic, institutional and political contexts: An empirical analysis of Dutch Deservingness opinions, 1975-2006. Social Indicators Research, 115(2), 731-749.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jensen, C., & Bang Petersen, M.(2017). The deservingness heuristic and the politics of health care. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 68-83.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kallio, J., & Kouvo, A.(2015). Street‐level bureaucrats' and the general public's deservingness perceptions of social assistance recipients in finland. Social Policy & Administration, 49(3), 316-334.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kootstra, A.(2016). Deserving and undeserving welfare claimants in Britain and the Netherlands: Examining the role of ethnicity and migration status using a vignette experiment. European Sociological Review, 32(3), 325-338.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kootstra, A.(2017). Us versus them: Examining the perceived deservingness of minority groups in the British welfare state using a survey experiment. Pp. 263-280 in W.Van Oorschot, F.Roosma, B.Meuleman & T.Reeskens (Eds.), The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes on welfare deservingness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kotlikoff, L. J., & Burns, S.(2005). The coming generational storm: What you need to know about America's economic future: MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Laenen, T.(2019). Welfare deservingness and welfare policy. New perspectives on popular deservingness opinions and their interaction with welfare state policies. Leuven: KU Leuven – Centrum voor Sociologisch Onderzoek (CeSO).
    [Google Scholar]
26. Laenen, T., & Meuleman, B.(2017). A universal rank order of deservingness? Geographical, temporal and social-structural comparisons. Pp. 37-54 in W.Van Oorschot, F.Roosma, B.Meuleman & T.Reeskens (Eds.), The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes on welfare deservingness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Laenen, T., & Meuleman, B.(2018). Public support for the social rights and social obligations of the unemployed: two sides of the same coin?. Norface Welfare States Futures thematic workshop: the social legitimacy of our future welfare state. International Journal of Social Welfare, 28(4).
    [Google Scholar]
28. Meuleman, B., Roosma, F., & Abts, K. (in print). Welfare deservingness opinions from heuristic to measurable concept: The CARIN deservingness principles scale. Social Science Research. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102352
    [Google Scholar]
29. Otjes, S., Louwerse, T., & Timmermans, A.(2018). The Netherlands: The reinvention of consensus democracy. Pp. 53-71 in E.De Giorgi & G.Ilonszki (Eds.), Opposition Parties in European Legislatures. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pardos-Prado, S., & Dinas, E.(2010). Systemic polarisation and spatial voting. European Journal of Political Research, 49(6), 759-786.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pettersen, P. A.(1995). The welfare state: The security dimension. Pp. 198-233 in O.Borre & E.Scarbrough (Eds.), The scope of government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Reeskens, T., & van der Meer, T.(2019). The inevitable deservingness gap: A study into the insurmountable immigrant penalty in perceived welfare deservingness. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(2).
    [Google Scholar]
33. Svallfors, S.(1997). Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: A comparison of eight western nations. European Sociological Review, 13(3), 283-304.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Svallfors, S.(2008). The generational contract in Sweden: Age-specific attitudes to age-related policies. Policy & Politics, 36(3), 381-396.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Svallfors, S.(2011). A bedrock of support? Trends in welfare state attitudes in Sweden, 1981-2010. SocialPolicy & Administration, 45(7), 806-825.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Van der Aa, M., Hiligsmann, Mickaël, Paulus, A., & Evers, S.(2017). Healthcare deservingness opinions of the general public and policymakers compared: A discrete choice experiment. Pp. 241-262 in W.Van Oorschot, F.Roosma, B.Meuleman & T.Reeskens (Eds.), The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes to welfare deservingness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Van Lancker, W., Ghysels, J., & Cantillon, B.(2015). The impact of child benefits on single mother poverty: Exploring the role of targeting in 15 European countries. International Journal of Social Welfare, 24(3), 210-222.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Van Oorschot, W.(2000). Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy & Politics, 28(1), 33-48.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Van Oorschot, W.(2006). Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1), 23-42.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Van Oorschot, W.(2008). Solidarity towards immigrants in European welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17(1), 3-14.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Van Oorschot, W., & Roosma, F.(2017). The social legitimacy of targeted welfare and welfare deservingness. Pp. 3-36 in W.Van Oorschot, F.Roosma, B.Meuleman & T.Reeskens (Eds.), The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes on welfare deservingness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Van Oorschot, W., Roosma, F., Meuleman, B., & Reeskens, T.(2017). The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes on welfare deservingness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]