De strijd om geloofwaardigheid: hoe de discussie over het onvoorwaardelijke basisinkomen onze kijk op activering veranderde

References

1. Bregman, R. (2014). Gratis geld voor iedereen – En nog vijf grote ideeën die de wereld kunnen veranderen. De Correspondent.
   [Google Scholar]
2. De Wispelaere, J., & Stirton, L. (2004). The many faces of universal basic income. The Political Quarterly, 75(3), 266-274.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Groot, L., Muffels, R., & Verlaat, T. (2019). Welfare states’ social investment strategies and the emergence of Dutch experiments on a minimum income guarantee. Social Policy and Society, 18(2), 277-287.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Groot, L., & Van der Veen, R. (2000). Clues and Leads in the Debate on Basic Income in the Netherlands. In Van der VeenR. & GrootL. (eds.), Basic income on the agenda. Policy objectives and political chances, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 197-223.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Leifeld, P. (2017). Discourse network analysis. The Oxford handbook of political networks, 301-326.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Offe, C., & Van Parijs, P. (2013). A non-productivist design for social policies. In K.Widerquist, J.A.Noguera, Y.Vanderborght, and J.De Wispelaere (eds.), Basic income: An anthology of contemporary research, Chichester: Wiley, 275-282.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Roosma, F. (2022). A Struggle for Framing and Interpretation: The Impact of the ‘Basic Income Experiments’ on Social Policy Reform in the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Security, 24(3), 192-212.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Traag, V. A., & Bruggeman, J. (2009). Community detection in networks with positive and negative links. Physical Review E, 80(3), 036115.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Van Parijs, P. (1991). Why surfers should be fed: the liberal case for an unconditional basic income. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 20(2) 101-131.
   [Google Scholar]