f Alles behalve country en western: een analyse van cultureel omnivorisme in het Verenigd Koninkrijk

References

1. Alderson, A. S., Junisbai, A., & Heacock, I. (2007). Social status and cultural consumption in the United States. Poetics, 35(2-3), 191-212.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allen, D. E., & Anderson, P. F. (1994). Consumption and social stratification: Bourdieu’s distinction. Advances in consumer research, 21(1), 70-74.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Robust chi square difference testing with mean and variance adjusted test statistics. Matrix, 1(5), 1-6.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Atkinson, W. (2011). The context and genesis of musical tastes: Omnivorousness debunked, Bourdieu buttressed. Poetics, 39(3), 169-186.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Autor, D. H., & Handel, M. J. (2013). Putting tasks to the test: Human capital, job tasks, and wages. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(1), 59-96.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bennett, T., Emmison, M., & Frow, J. (1999). Accounting for tastes: Australian everyday cultures. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bennett, T., Savage, M., Silva, E. B., Warde, A., Gayo-Cal, M., & Wright, D. (2009). Culture, class, distinction. London, England: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bergman, D. (1993). Camp Grounds: Style and Homosexuality. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. London, England: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brienza, C. (2014). Did manga conquer America? Implications for the cultural policy of ‘Cool Japan’. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 20(4), 383-398.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bryson, B. (1996). “Anything but heavy metal”: symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes. American sociological review, 61(5), 884-899.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chan, T. W. (2013). Understanding cultural omnivores: Social and political attitudes. Retrieved from: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0006/papers/att3.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chan, T. W., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). Social stratification and cultural consumption: Music in England. European sociological review, 23(1), 1-19.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Coulangeon, P. (2005). Social stratification of musical tastes: questioning the cultural legitimacy model. Revue Française De Sociologie, 46(5), 123-154.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Coulangeon, P. (2017). Cultural openness as an emerging form of cultural capital in contemporary France. Cultural Sociology, 11(2), 145-164.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Coulangeon, P., & Lemel, Y. (2007). Is ‘distinction’ really outdated? Questioning the meaning of the omnivorization of musical taste in contemporary France. Poetics, 35(2-3), 93-111.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cutts, D., & Widdop, P. (2017). Reimagining omnivorousness in the context of place. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(3), 480-503.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Daenekindt, S., & Roose, H. (2013). A mise-en-scène of the shattered habitus: The effect of social mobility on aesthetic dispositions towards films. European Sociological Review, 29(1), 48-59.
    [Google Scholar]
19. De Graaf, N. D., & Ganzeboom, H. B. (1990). Cultuurdeelname en opleiding: Een analyse van statusgroepeffecten met diagonale referentiemodellen. Mens en Maatschappij, 65(3), 219-244.
    [Google Scholar]
20. De Vries, R., & Reeves, A. (2021). What does it mean to be a cultural omnivore? Conflicting visions of omnivorousness in empirical research. Sociological Research Online, 1-21.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Emmison, M. (2003). Social class and cultural mobility: reconfiguring the cultural omnivore thesis. Journal of Sociology, 39(3), 211-230.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Erickson, B. H. (1996). Culture, class, and connections. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 217-251.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Forster, M. R. (2000). Key concepts in model selection: Performance and generalizability. Journal of mathematical psychology, 44(1), 205-231.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Friedman, S. (2012). Cultural omnivores or culturally homeless? Exploring the shifting cultural identities of the upwardly mobile. Poetics, 40(5), 467-489.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Friedman, S., & Kuipers, G. (2013). The divisive power of humour: Comedy, taste and symbolic boundaries. Cultural sociology, 7(2), 179-195.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Frith, S. (1990). What is good music?Canadian University Music Review, 10(2), 92-102.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ganzeboom, H. B. (1982). Cultuurdeelname als verwerking van informatie of verwerving van status. Een confrontatie van twee alternatieve verklarende theorieën aan de hand van reeds verricht onderzoek. Mens en Maatschappij, 57(4), 341-372.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gogerly, L. (2011). Graffiti culture. Minneapolis, MN: Lerner.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hanquinet, L. (2017). Exploring dissonance and omnivorousness: Another look into the rise of eclecticism. Cultural Sociology, 11(2), 165-187.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Hazır, I. K., & Warde, A. (2015). The cultural omnivore thesis: Methodological aspects of the debate. In L.Hanquinet & M.Savage (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of the sociology of art and culture (pp. 97-151). Abingdon-on-Thames, England: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Johnston, J., & Baumann, S. (2007). Democracy versus distinction: A study of omnivorousness in gourmet food writing. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 165-204.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Katz-Gerro, T., & Jaeger, M. M. (2013). Top of the pops, ascend of the omnivores, defeat of the couch potatoes: Cultural consumption profiles in Denmark 1975–2004. European Sociological Review, 29(2), 243-260.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kim, S. J., Joo, H. J., & Choi, S. (2020). Anything but Gugak and Trot. Journal of Asian sociology, 49(3), 321-350.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lahire, B. (2008). The individual and the mixing of genres: Cultural dissonance and self-distinction. Poetics, 36(2-3), 166-188.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lahire, B., (2011). The plural actor. Cambridge, England: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lamont, M. & Thévenot, P. (2000). Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Leguina, A., Widdop, P., & Tampubolon, G. (2016). The global omnivore: Identifying musical taste groups in Austria, England, Israel and Serbia. Sociological Research Online, 21(3), 24-40.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Leonard, N. (1962). Jazz and the white Americans: the acceptance of a new art form. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Levine, L. W. (1988). Highbrow/lowbrow: The emergence of cultural hierarchy in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Li, Y., Savage, M., & Warde, A. (2008). Social mobility and social capital in contemporary Britain. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(3), 391-411.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Lin, T. H., & Dayton, C. M. (1997). Model selection information criteria for nonnested latent class models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22(3), 249-264.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Lizardo, O. (2006). How cultural tastes shape personal networks. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 778-807.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Petersen, K. J., Qualter, P., & Humphrey, N. (2019). The application of latent class analysis for investigating population child mental health: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1214.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Peterson, R. A. (1992). Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore. Poetics, 21(4), 243-258.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. (1996) Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 900–907.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Peterson, R. A., & Simkus, A. (1992). How musical tastes mark occupational status groups. In M.Lamont & M.Fournier (Eds.), Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality (pp. 152186). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Prieur, A., Rosenlund, L., & Skjott-Larsen, J. (2008). Cultural capital today: A case study from Denmark. Poetics, 36(1), 45-71.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2009). ‘Strangers in paradise’? Working-class students in elite universities. Sociology, 43(6), 1103-1121.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Robette, N., & Roueff, O. (2014). An eclectic eclecticism: Methodological and theoretical issues about the quantification of cultural omnivorism. Poetics, 47, 23-40.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Savage, M., & Gayo, M. (2011). Unravelling the omnivore: A field analysis of contemporary musical taste in the United Kingdom. Poetics, 39(5), 337-357.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Silva, E. B. (2006). Distinction through visual art. Cultural Trends, 15(2-3), 141-158.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Silva, E. B., Bennett, T., Savage, M., Warde, A. (2008). Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion: a Critical Investigation [Datafile]. Retrieved from: https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/studies/study?id=5832#!/details
    [Google Scholar]
53. Van der Stichele, A., & Laermans, R. (2006). Cultural participation in Flanders: Testing the cultural omnivore thesis with population data. Poetics, 34(1), 45-64.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Van Eijck, K. (1997). The impact of family background and educational attainment on cultural consumption: A sibling analysis. Poetics, 25(4), 195-224.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Van Eijck, K. (1999). Socialization, education, and lifestyle: How social mobility increases the cultural heterogeneity of status groups. Poetics, 26(5-6), 309-328.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Van Eijck, K. (2000). RichardA.Peterson and the culture of consumption. Poetics, 28(2-3), 207-224.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Van Eijck, K. (2001). Social differentiation in musical taste patterns. Social forces, 79(3), 1163-1185.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Vanzella-Yang, A. (2018). The stratification of attendance at cultural activities in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 55(3), 476-494.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Veenstra, G. (2015). Class position and musical tastes: A sing-off between the cultural omnivorism and Bourdieusian homology frameworks. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 52(2), 134-159.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Warde, A., Martens, L., & Olsen, W. (1999). Consumption and the problem of variety: cultural omnivorousness, social distinction and dining out. Sociology, 33(1), 105-127.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Warde, A., Wright, D., & Gayo-Cal, M. (2007). Understanding cultural omnivorousness: Or, the myth of the cultural omnivore. Cultural sociology, 1(2), 143-164.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Whitty, G., Hayton, A., & Tang, S. (2015). Who you know, what you know and knowing the ropes: A review of evidence about access to higher education institutions in England. Review of Education, 3(1), 27-67.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Wuggenig, U. (2007). Comments on Chan and Goldthorpe: Pitfalls in testing Bourdieu’s homology assumptions using mainstream social science methodology: Social stratification and cultural consumption: The visual arts in England. Poetics, 35(4-5), 306-316.
    [Google Scholar]