oa Over rituelen en routines in opening en afsluiting van service encounters in toerismekantoren in Nederland en Vlaanderen

References

1. Albert, S. & S.Kessler(1978). Ending social encounters. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology14, 541-553.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Clark, H. & J.W.French(1981). Telephone goodbyes. Language in Society10, 1-19.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Coulmas, F.(1979). On the sociolinguistic relevance of routine formulae. Journal of Pragmatics3, 239-266.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Coulmas, F.(1981). Conversational routine. Explorations in standardized and communication situations and prepatterned speech. The Hague: Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Coupland, N.(1983). Patterns of encounter management: further arguments for discourse variables. Language in Society12, 459-476.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Drew, P. & J.Heritage(1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DumasI.(2003). Au-delà de la transaction, le lien social. Approche comparative d’interactions en situation de commerce et de service. Lyon: Université Lumière Lyon 2.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Félix-Brasdefer, J. C.(2015). The language of service encounters: a pragmatic-discursive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Firth, R.(1972). Verbal and bodily rituals of greeting and parting. In: J.S.La Fontaine (red.), The Interpretation of Ritual: Essays in Honour of A. I. Richards. London: Tavistock, 1-38.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Goffman, E.(1967). Interaction ritual: essay on face-to-face behavior. New York: Anchor.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Goffman, E.(1971). Relations in Public. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Goffman, E.(1974). Les rites d’interaction. Paris: Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Goffman, E.(1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Heritage, J. & D.Greatbatch(1991). On the institutional character of institutional talk: the case of news interviews. In: D.Boden & D.Zimmerman (red.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 93-137.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hmed, N.(2000). Comparaison des interactions dans des commerces en France et en Tunisie. In: V.Traverso (red.), Perspectives interculturelles sur l’interaction. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon, 135-150.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hofstede, G.(1980). Culture’s consequences. International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hofstede, G.(2001). Culture’s consequences. Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Second edition. Newbury Park/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hofstede, G., G.-J.Hofstede & M.Minkov(2010). Cultures and organizations. Software of the mind. McGraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lehmann, C. (1995/1982). Thoughts on grammaticalisation. München/ Newcastle: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.(1994). Les interactions verbales (tome 3). Paris: Armand Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.(1996). La conversation. Paris: Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.(2001). ‘Je voudrais un p’tit bifteck’. La politesse à la française en site commercial. Carnets du Cediscor7, 1-12.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.(2005). Le discours en interaction. Paris: A. Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.(2006). Politeness in small shops in France. Journal of politeness research2, 79-103.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.(2008). Les actes de langage dans le discours. Théorie et fonctionnement. Paris: Armand Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. & V.Traverso(2008). Les interactions en site commercial: invariants et variations. Lyon: ENS éditions.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.(2014). (Im)politesse et gestion des faces dans deux types de situations communicatives: petits commerces et débats électoraux. Soprag2, 293-326.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Márquez-Reiter, R. & M. PlacenciaM.(2004). Displaying closeness and respectful distance in Montevidean and Quiteño service encounters. In: Márquez-Reiter and M.Placencia (red.), Current trends in de pragmatics of Spanish. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 121-156.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Márquez-Reiter, R. & P.Bou-Franch(2017). (Im)politeness in service encounters. In: J.Culpeper, M.Haugh & D.Kádár (red.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 661-687.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mazeland, H.(2003). Inleiding in de conversatie-analyse. Bussum: Coutinho.
    [Google Scholar]
31. McCarthy, M.(2000). Mutually captive audiences: smalltalk and the genre of close-contact service encounters. In: J.Coupland (red.), Smalltalk. Harlow: Pearson, 84-109.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Schegloff, A. & H.Sacks, (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica7, 289-327.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Traverso, V.(1996). La conversation familière. Analyse pragmatique des interactions. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Traverso, V.(1999). L'analyse des conversations. Paris: Nathan.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Vandekerckhove, R.(2005). Belgian Dutch versus Netherlandic Dutch: New patterns of divergence? On pronouns of address and diminutives. Multilingua: journal of cross-cultural and interlanguage communication24, 379-397.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Vandekerckhove, R.(2007). ‘Tussentaal’ as a source of change from below in Belgian Dutch. A case study of substandardization processes in the chat language of Flemish teenagers. In: S.Elspass, N.Langer, J.Scharloth & W.Vandenbussche (red.), Germanic language histories from below (1700-2000). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 189-203.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Vismans, R.(2015). Negotiating address in a pluricentric language: Dutch/Flemish. In: C.Norrby & C.Wide (red.), Address practice as social action: European perspectives. London: Palgrave Pivot, 13-32.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Wiercińska, K.(2016). Diminutief als beleefdheidsstrategie: Een vergelijking tussen Nederland en Vlaanderen. Roczniki Humanistyczne64, 125-137.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wine, L.(2008). Towards a Deeper Understanding of Framing, Footing, and Alignment. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics8(2), 1-3.
    [Google Scholar]