Linking morphs, stress and meaning in Dutch complex caritive adjectives

References

1. Aarts, Bas (1992). Small clauses in English: The non-verbal types. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arsenijević, Boban & MarkoSimonović (2013). The role of syntax in stress assignment in Serbo-Croatian. In Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds.), Syntax and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Booij, Geert (1995). The phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Booij, Geert (2002). The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Booij, Geert (2007). Construction morphology and the lexicon. In Fabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Nabil Hathout (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse. Somerville: Cascadilla Press, 34–44.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Borer, Hagit (2013). Taking form. Structuring sense: Volume III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bowers, John (1993). The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry24, 591–656.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Broekhuis, Hans & LeonieCornips (1994). Undative constructions. Linguistics32, 173–189.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chomsky, Noam & MorrisHalle (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
   [Google Scholar]
10. De Clercq, Karen & GuidoVanden Wyngaerd (2019). Negation and the functional sequence. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory37, 425–460.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dikken, Marcel den (1999). On the structural representation of possession and agreement. The case of (anti-)agreement in Hungarian possessed nominal phrases. In István Kenesei (ed.), Crossing Boundaries: Theoretical Advances in Central and Eastern European Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 137–178.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dikken, Marcel den (2006). Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dikken, Marcel den & ÉvaDékány (2023). On collectives with numerals. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on the Structure of Hungarian (ICSH16), Graz, and at the ‘Nominal determination: Form, function, and else’ conference, Federal University of Alagoas.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Faust, Noam, MarijkeDe Belder & NicolaLampitelli (2009). On an inflectional and a derivational diminutive. Paper presented at the Roots Workshop, 10–12June2009, Stuttgart University.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Geerts, G., W.Haeseryn, J.de Rooij & M.C.van den Toorn (eds.) (1984). Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst [General Dutch grammar]. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Guéron, Jacqueline (1984). Inalienable possession, PRO-inclusion, and lexical chains. In Jacqueline Guéron, Hans-Georg Obenauer & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), Grammatical representation. Dordrecht: Foris, 43–86.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Haas, Wim de & MiekeTrommelen (1993). Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands. Een overzicht van de woordvorming. ’s Gravenhage: SDU.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hoeksema, Jack (1984). Categorial morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Koester, Dirk, Th. Gunter, S. Wagner & AngelaFriederici (2004). Morphosyntax, prosody, and linking elements: The auditory processing of German nominal compounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience16, 1647–68.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Koornwinder, Niels Oele (2005). Morfologische aspecten van het ideale woordenboek [Morphological aspects of the ideal dictionary]. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Krott, Andrea, HaraldBaayen & RobertSchreuder (2001). Analogy in morphology: Modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch. Linguistics39, 51–93.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Marantz, Alec (1984). On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Marantz, Alec (2001). Words and things. Ms., MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Marvin, Tatjana (2003). Topics in the stress and syntax of words. PhD dissertation, MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Mattens, Wim (1970). De indifferentialis: Een onderzoek naar het anumerieke gebruik van het substantief in het Algemeen Bruikbaar Nederlands. Assen: Van Gorcum.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mattens, Wim (1990). De spelling van tussenklanken. De nieuwe taalgids83, 540–552.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Matushansky, Ora (2019). Against the PredP theory of small clauses. Linguistic Inquiry50, 63–104.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Partee, Barbara (1983/1997). Uniformity vs. versatility: The genitive, a case study. Appendix to TheoJanssen (1997), Compositionality, in Johanvan Benthem & Aliceter Meulen (eds.), The handbook of logic and language. New York: Elsevier, 464–470.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Schreuder, Robert, AnnekeNeijt, Femkevan der Weide & HaraldBaayen (1998). Regular plurals in Dutch compounds: Linking graphemes or morphemes?Language and Cognitive Processes13, 551–73.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Toorn, M.C. van den (1982). Tendenzen bij de beregeling van de verbindingsklank in nominale samenstellingen I. De nieuwe taalgids75, 24–33.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Vergnaud, Jean-Roger & MariaLuisa Zubizarreta (1992). The definite determiner and the inalienable constructions in French and English. Linguistic Inquiry23, 595–652.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Wouden, Ton van der (2007). Vrouwtjesgrammatica. Tabu36, 127–47.
    [Google Scholar]