2004
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1566-7146
  • E-ISSN: 2667-1611

Samenvatting

Summary

The borrower’s liability, as stated in article 7A:1781 section 1 of the Dutch Civil Code, differs from the Roman law tradition. In Justinian and Medieval Roman law the borrower’s liability was determined in accordance with the utility principle. As a consequence, the borrower was in some cases even without fault liable for theft. Roman law still played a role in the development towards the rule in the Dutch Civil Code, but ultimately the influence of the French Civil Code turned out to be stronger and has to be considered as the turning point in the interpretation of the borrower’s liability. The duty of care of a borrower comprise now merely due diligence (‘zorg van een goed huisvader’). Judges make a proper assessment to determine the liability of the borrower, taking into account the interests of the parties, the obligations of the parties and the circumstances.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/PM2019.1.003.DEJO
2019-01-01
2024-12-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/PM2019.1.003.DEJO
Loading
Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error