Esthetische omnivoren

References

1. Alexander, V.D.(2003)Sociology of the arts. Exploring fine and popular forms. Malden: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bachmayer, T., N. Wilterdink en A. van Venrooij(2014)Taste differentiation and hierarchization within popular culture: The case of salsa music. Poetics, 47: 60-82.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baumann, S.(2001)Intellectualization and art world development: Film in the United States. American Sociological Review, 66(3): 404-426.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Becker, H.(1982)Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bell-Villada, G.H.(1996)Art for art’s sake and literary life. How politics and markets helped shape the ideology and culture of aestheticism 1790-1990. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bennett, T., M. Savage, E. Silva, A. Warde, M. Gayo-Cal en D. Wright(2009)Culture, class, distinction. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Benzecry, C. en R. Collins(2014)The high of cultural experience: Toward a microsociology of cultural consumption. Sociological Theory, 32(4): 307-326.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bourdieu, P.(1984)Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bourdieu, P.(1996)The rules of art. Genesis and structure of the literary field. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Daenekindt, S.(2017)On the structure of dispositions. Transposability of and oppositions between aesthetic dispositions. Poetics, 62: 43-52.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Daenekindt, S. en H. Roose(2013)A mise-en-scène of the shattered habitus: The effect of social mobility on aesthetic dispositions towards films. European Sociological Review, 29(1): 48-59.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Daenekindt, S. en H. Roose(2017)Ways of preferring: Distinction through the ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of cultural consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(1): 25-45.
    [Google Scholar]
13. De Meyer, G.(2006)De beste smaak is de slechte smaak. Populaire cultuur en complexiteit. Leuven: Acco.
    [Google Scholar]
14. DeNora, T.(2000)Music in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Friedman, S. en G. Kuipers(2013)The divisive power of humour: Comedy, taste and symbolic boundaries. Cultural Sociology, 7(2): 179-195.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gans, H.J. (1999 [1974]) Popular culture and high culture. An analysis and evaluation of taste (herziene druk). New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ganzeboom, H.(1982)Cultuurdeelname als verwerking van informatie of verwerving van status: een confrontatie van twee alternatieve verklarende theorieën aan de hand van reeds verricht onderzoek. Mens en Maatschappij, 57(4): 341-372.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Haak, M. van den(2014)Disputing about taste. Practices and perceptions of cultural hierarchy in the Netherlands. Proefschrift, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Haak, M. van den(2018)High culture unravelled. A historical and empirical analysis of contrasting logics of cultural hierarchy. Human Figurations, 7(1).
    [Google Scholar]
20. Halle, D.(1993)Inside culture. Art and class in the American home. Chicago: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hanquinet, L., H. Roose en M. Savage(2014)The eye of the beholder: Aesthetic preferences and the remaking of cultural capital. Sociology, 48(1): 111-132.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hartog Jager, H. den(2014)Het streven. Kan hedendaagse kunst de wereld verbeteren?Amsterdam: Athenaeum-Polak & Van Gennep.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hekkert, P. en P.C.W. van Wieringen(1996)Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. The American Journal of Psychology, 109(3): 389-407.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hennion, A.(2001)Music lovers. Taste as performance. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(5): 1-22.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Holstein, J.A. en J.F. Gubrium(1995)The active interview. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Holt, D.B.(1998)Does cultural capital structure American consumption?Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1): 1-25.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jarness, V.(2015)Modes of consumption: From ‘what’ to ‘how’ in cultural stratification research. Poetics, 53: 65-79.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Johnston, J. en S. Baumann(2007)Democracy versus Distinction: A study of omnivorousness in gourmet food writing. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1): 165-204.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lamont, M.(1992)Money, morals and manners. The culture of the French and American upper-middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lizardo, O.(2008)The question of culture consumption and stratification revisited. Sociologica, 2.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Michael, J.(2017)Highbrow culture for high-potentials? Cultural orientations of a business elite in the making. Poetics, 61: 39-52.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ollivier, M.(2008)Modes of openness to cultural diversity: Humanist, populist, practical, and indifferent. Poetics, 36(2-3): 120-147.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Parsons, M.J.(1987)How we understand art. A cognitive developmental account of aesthetic experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Peters, J., K. van Eijck en J. Michael(2018)Secretly Serious? Maintaining and crossing cultural boundaries in the karaoke bar through ironic consumption. Cultural Sociology, 12(1): 58-74.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Peterson, R.A. en A. Simkus (1992)How musical tastes mark occupational status groups. In: M.Lamont en M.Fournier (red.) Cultivating differences. Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 152-186.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Rimmer, M.(2012)Beyond omnivores and univores: The promise of a concept of musical habitus. Cultural Sociology, 6(3): 299-318.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Roose, H.(2008)Many-voiced or unisono? An inquiry into motives for attendance and aesthetic dispositions of the audience attending classical concerts. Acta Sociologica, 51(3): 237-253.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rössel, J.(2011)Cultural capital and the variety of modes of cultural consumption in the opera audience. The Sociological Quarterly, 52: 83-103.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Schulze, G.(1992)Die Erlebsnisgesellschaft: Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Swidler, A.(2001)Talk of love. How culture matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Thornton, S.(1995)Club cultures: Music, media, and subcultural capital. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Vander Stichele, A.(2007)De culturele alleseter? Een kwantitatief en kwalitatief onderzoek naar ‘culturele omnivoriteit’ in Vlaanderen. Proefschrift, KU Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Venrooij, A. van en V. Schmutz(2010)The evaluation of popular music in the United States, Germany and the Netherlands: A comparison of the use of high art and popular aesthetic criteria. Cultural Sociology, 4(3): 395-421.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Vermeulen, L. en M. van den Haak(2012)“Je moet onder aan de ladder beginnen.” Distinctie en hiërarchie binnen de klassieke en hedendaagse muziek. Sociologie, 8(3): 273-296.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Wermuth, M.(2002)No sell out. De popularisering van een subcultuur. Amsterdam: Aksant.
    [Google Scholar]
46. White, H.C. en C.A. White(1965)Canvases and careers. Institutional change in the French painting world. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]