2004
Volume 39, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0169-2216
  • E-ISSN: 2468-9424

Abstract

Samenvatting

In dit artikel werd middels een literatuurverkenning onderzocht hoe hybride werkvormen, waarbij werknemers afwisselend substantieel thuiswerken en op kantoor werken, toekomstbestendig gemaakt kunnen worden met het oog op de werk-privébalans en productiviteit. De pre-corona literatuur betreft voornamelijk thuiswerken (maximaal één dag per week). Dit type thuiswerken blijkt positief samen te hangen met productiviteit. De bevindingen voor de werk-privébalans zijn minder eenduidig. De literatuur over (minimaal twee dagen per week) thuiswerken levert vooralsnog geen hard bewijs, maar we concluderen voorzichtig dat er geen aanwijzingen zijn voor consistent nadelige effecten op de werk-privébalans.

Tussen substantieel thuiswerken en productiviteit lijkt voornamelijk een positieve relatie te bestaan. Voor substantieel thuiswerken in het kader van hybride werken formuleren wij de volgende aandachtspunten voor werkgevers: (1) het is aan te bevelen een balans te vinden tussen organisatiebeleid dat een raamwerk biedt voor hybride werken en het faciliteren van maatwerk op team- en individueel niveau; (2) faciliteer substantieel thuiswerken wanneer dat praktisch mogelijk is en er behoefte aan is; (3) geef werknemers voldoende autonomie om te kiezen wanneer er wordt thuisgewerkt, maar waarborg tegelijkertijd face-to-facecontact voor teamcohesie en -creativiteit; (4) substantieel thuiswerken vraagt om een adequate thuiswerkplek waar een werknemer geconcentreerd en prettig kan werken.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2023.2.006.CRAM
2023-06-01
2025-01-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexopoulos, A. N., & Buckley, F. (2013). What trust matters when: The temporal value of professional and personal trust for effective knowledge transfer. Group & Organization Management, 38, 361-391.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alfes, K., Avgoustaki, A., Beauregard, T. A., Cañibano, A., & Muratbekova-Touron, M. (2022). New ways of working and the implications for employees: a systematic framework and suggestions for future research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33, 4361-4385.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Algrari, A. Y. (2017). The influences of telecommuting on teleworkers skills. Journal of Computer Engineering, 19, 45-48.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16, 40-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66, 345-376.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Andrulli, R., & Gerards, R. (2023). How new ways of working during COVID-19 affect employee well-being via technostress, need for recovery, and work engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107560.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ayar, D., Karaman, M., A., & Karaman, R. (2021). Work-life balance and mental health needs of health professionals during COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20, 639-655.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ayuso, L. F., Requena, F., Jiménez-Rodriguez, O., & Khamis, N. (2020). The effects of COVID-19 confinement on the Spanish family: Adaptation or change? Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 51, 274-287.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Basekin, E. (2022). Twee dagen per week thuiswerken is nog steeds de norm. https://www.nu.nl/economie/6236004/twee-dagen-per-week-thuiswerken-is-nogsteeds-de-norm.html
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Beckers, D. G. J., Kompier, M. A. J., Kecklund, G., & Härmä, M. (2012). Worktime control: theoretical conceptualization, current empirical knowledge, and research agenda. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment& Health, 38, 291-297.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Beckmann, M., Cornelissen, T., & Kräkel, M. (2017). Self-managed working time and employee effort: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 133, 285-302.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Beigi, M., Shirmohammadi, M., & Stewart, J. (2018). Flexible work arrangements and work-family conflict: A metasynthesis of qualitative studies among academics. Human Resource Development Review, 17, 314-336.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bin, W., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70, 16-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 165-218.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Boca, D., Daniela, N. O., Profeta, P., & Rossi, M. (2020). Women’s and men’s work, housework, and childcare, before and during COVID-19. Review of Economics of the Household, 18, 1001-1017.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Boell, S. K., Cecez-Kacmanovic, D., & Campbell, J. (2016). Telework paradoxes and practices: the importance of the nature of work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31, 114-131.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Brynjolfsson, E., Horton, J. J., Ozimek, A., Rock, D., Sharma, G., & TuYe, H. -Y. (2020). COVID-19 and remote work: An early look at US data. NBER Working Paper.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Burk, B. N., Pechenik Mausolf, A., & Oakleaf, L. (2021). Pandemic motherhood and the academy: A critical examination of the leisure-work dichotomy. Leisure Sciences, 43, 225-231.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Catana, S.-A., Toma, S. -G., Imbrisca, C., & Burcea, M. (2022). Teleworking impact on wellbeing and productivity: A cluster analysis of the Romanian graduate employees. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 856196.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Citrix (2022). Work rebalanced: The Citrix hybrid work report. https://www.citrix.com/content/dam/citrix/en_us/documents/brochure/work-rebalanced-the-citrix-hybrid-work-report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Coenen, M., & Kok, R. A. W. (2014). Workplace flexibility and new product development performance: The role of telework and flexible work schedules. European Management Journal, 32, 564-576.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Craig, L. (2020). Coronavirus, domestic labour and care: Gendered roles locked down. Journal of Sociology, 56. https://doi.org.10.1177/1440783320942413
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Craig, L., & Churchill, B. (2021). Dual-earner parent couples’ work and care during COVID-19. Gender, Work & Organization, 28, 66-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Cramer, A. O. J., Beckers, D., Geurts, S., Griep, Y., & Van Hooff, M. (2023). Wanneer thuiswerken werkt. Voordelen, valkuilen en aandachtspunten met betrekking tot werk-privé balans, productiviteit en sociale aspecten van werk. Kennisdossier, onderdeel van onderzoeksproject Toekomstbestendig Hybride Werken. Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dahlstrom, T. R. (2013). Telecommuting and leadership style. Public Personnel Management, 42, 438-451.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. De Ruiter, M., & Peters, P. (2021). Flexible Work Initiatives, Employee Workplace Well-Being, and Organizational Performance: A Review of Intervention Studies. In P.Brough, E.Gardiner, & K.Daniels. Handbook on Management and Employment Practices. Handbook Series in Occupational Health Sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24936-6_30-1
    [Google Scholar]
  27. De Wind, A., Beckers, D. G. J., Nijp, H. H., Hooftman, W., de Boer, A. G. E. M., & Geurts, S. A. E. (2021). Working from home: mismatch between access and need in relation to work-home interference and fatigue. Scandinavian Journal of Work & Environmental Health, 47, 619-627.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Dekker, F., & Koster, F. (2020). Thuiswerken en innovatie: het gaat er niet om waar je werkt. Mens en Maatschappij, 95, 321-337.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Derks, D., Bakker, A. B., Peters, P., & Van Wingerden, P. (2016). Work-related smartphone use, work-family conflict and family role performance: The role of segmentation preference. Human Relations, 69, 1045-1068.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. de Valdenebro Campo, A. M., Avolio, B., & Carlier, S. I. (2021). The relationship between telework, job performance, work-life balance and family supportive supervisor behaviours in the context of COVID-19. Global Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211049918
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Dima, A. -M., Tuclea, C. -E., Vrânceanu, D. -M., & Tigu, G. (2019). Sustainable social and individual implications of telework: A new insight into the Romanian labor market. Sustainability, 11, 3506.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Etheridge, B., Wang, Y., & Tang, L. (2020). Worker productivity during lockdown and working from home: Evidence from self-reports. ISER Working Paper Series, 2020-12. University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), Colchester.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Felstead, A., & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32, 195-212.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524-1541.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gajendran, R. S., Harrison, D. A., & Delaney-Klinger, K. (2014). Are telecommuters remotely good citizens? Unpacking telecommuting’s effects on performance via i-deals and job resources. Personnel Psychology, 68, 353-393.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Gerich, J. (2022). Home-based telework and presenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64, 243-249.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Geurts, S. A. E., & Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Work & Environmental Health, 32, 482-492.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2005). The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31, 301-318.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of superior-subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 77-88.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Gorlick, A. (2020). The productivity pitfalls of working from home in the age of COVID-19. Stanford News. https://news.stanford.edu/2020/03/30/productivity-pitfalls-working-home-age-covid-19/
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hager, F. W. (2018). Links between telecommuting, social support and mental well-being among teleworkers: a literature review. International Journal of Business and Management, 6, 36-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hanaysha, J. (2016). Improving employee productivity through work engagement: Empirical evidence from higher education sector. Management Science Letters, 6, 61-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Hjálmsdóttir, A., & Bjarnadóttir, V. S. (2021). “I have turned into a foreman here at home”: Families and work-life balance in times of COVID-19 in a gender equality paradise. Gender, Work & Organization, 28, 268-283.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Ipsen, C., Van Veldhoven, M., Kirchner, K., & Hansen, J. P. (2021). Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from home in Europe during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 1826.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Janet, S., & Stokoe, E. H. (2005). Discourses of work-life balance: Negotiating ‘gender blind’ terms in organizations. Gender, Work & Organization, 12, 147-168.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Jongen, E., Verstraten, P., & Zimpelmann, C. (2021). Thuiswerken vóór, tijdens en ná de coronacrisis. Centraal Planbureau. https://www.cpb.nl/sites/default/files/omnidownload/CPB-Achtergronddocument-Thuiswerken-voor-tijdens-en-na-de-coronacrisis_1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Josten, E., & Merens, A. (2021). Thuis of terug naar kantoor. Plus- en minpunten van thuiswerken voor het welbevinden van werknemers. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. https://www.scp.nl/publicaties/publicaties/2021/07/14/thuis-of-terug-naar-kantoor
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kazekami, S. (2020). Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework. The International Journal of Digital Economy, Data Sciences and New Media, 5-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Kecklund, G., Beckers, D. G. J., Tucker, P. T., & Leineweber, C. (2017). How does work fit with my life? The relation between flexible work arrangements, work-life balance and recovery from work. In N.Chmiel, F.Fraccaroli & M.Sverke (Reds.). An introduction to work and organizational psychology: An international perspective (pp. 430-447). Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Khodaparasti, R. B., & Garbollagh, H. B. (2022). Antecedents and consequences of telecommuting on public organizations in Iran: the case of west Azerbaijan province. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2021-0505
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Kotera, Y., & Vione, K. C. (2020). Psychological impacts of the new ways of working (NWW): A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 1-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Kotini-Shah, P., Man, B., Pobee, R., Hirshfield, L. E., Risman, B. J., Buhimschi, I. A., & Weinreich, H. M. (2022). Work-life balance and productivity among academic faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic: A latent class analysis. Journal of Women’s Health, 31, 321-330.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Kreiner, G. E. (2006). Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person-environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 485-507.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Krukowski, R. A., Jagsi, R., & Cardel, M. I. (2021). Academic productivity differences by gender and child age in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Women’s Health, 30, 341-347.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Leo, A., Holdsworth, E. A., Wilcox, K. C., Khan, M. I., Mola Avila, J. A., & Tobin, J. (2022). Gendered impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-method study of teacher stress and work-life balance. Community, Work & Family. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2022.2124905
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Martin, B., & MacDonnell, R. (2012). Is telework effective for organizations? A meta-analysis of empirical research on perceptions of telework and organizational outcomes. Management Research Review, 35, 602-616.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, Y. A. (2013). The autonomy paradox: the implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24, 1337-1357.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Mehdi, T., & Morissette, R. (2021). Working from home: Productivity and preferences. StatCan COVID-19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada, catalogue no. 45280001.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Metselaar, S. A., Den Dulk, L., & Vermeeren, B. (2022). Teleworking at different locations outside the office: Consequences for perceived performance and the mediating role of autonomy and work-life balance satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 0, 1-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Minello, A., Martucci, S., & Manzo, L. K. C. (2021). The pandemic and the academic mothers: Present hardships and future perspectives. European Societies, 23, 82-94.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Monica, M., Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Manuti, A., Luisa Giancaspro, M., Russo, V., Zito, M., & Cortese, C. G. (2020). Wellbeing costs of technology use during COVID-19 remote working: An investigation using the Italian translation of the Technostress Creators Scale. Sustainability, 12, 5911.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Morganson, V. J., Major, D. A., Oborn, K. L., Verive, J. M., & Heelan, M. P. (2010). Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements. Differences in work-life balance support, job satisfaction, and inclusion. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 578-595.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Moss, J. (2019). When passion leads to burnout. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/07/when-passion-leads-to-burnout
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Mutiganda, J. C., Wiitavaara, B., Heiden, M., Svensson, S., Fagerström, A., Bergström, G., & Aboagye, E. (2022). A systematic review of the research on telework and organizational economic performance indicators. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1035310.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Nakrosiené, A., Buciūniené, E., & Gostautaité, B. (2019). Working from home: Characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower, 40, 87-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Nijp, H. H., Beckers, D. G. J., Geurts, S. A. E., Tucker, P., & Kompier, M A. J., (2012). Systematic review on the association between employee worktime control and work-non-work balance, health and well-being, and job-related outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 38, 299-313.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. O’Neill, T. A., Hambley, L. A., Greidanus, N. S., MacDonnell, R., & Kline, T. B. (2009). Predicting teleworker success: An exploration of personality, motivational, situational, and job characteristics. New Technology, Work & Employment, 24, 144-162.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Palumbo, R., Manna, R., & Cavallone, M. (2020). Beware of side effects on quality! Investigating the implications of home working on work-life balance in educational services. The TQM Journal, 4, 915-929.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Parlak, S., Celebi Cakirogly, C., & Oksuz Gul, F. (2021). Gender roles during COVID-19 pandemic: The experiences of Turkish female academics. Gender, Work & Organization, 28, 461-483.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Pass, S., & Ridgway, M. (2022). An informed discussion on the impact of COVID-19 and ‘enforced’ remote working on employee engagement. Human Resource Development International, 25, 254-270.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Peters, P., & Batenburg, R. (2015). Telework adoption and formalisation in organisations from a knowledge transfer perspective. International Journal of Work Innovation, 1, 251-270. doi: 10.1504/IJWI.2015.074169.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Peters, P., Blomme, R., Van Heertum, A., & Derks, D. (2017). Exploring the ‘Boundary Control Paradox’ and How to Cope with it: A Social Theoretical Perspective on Managing Work-Life Boundaries and Work-Life Balance in the Late Modern Workplace. In S.De Groof (Ed.) Work-life balance in the modern workplace: Interdisciplinary perspectives from work-family research, law and policy on the blurring of boundaries between work and private life (pp. 261-284). The Bulletin of Comparative Labour Relations. Kluwer Law International.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Peters, P., Den Dulk, L., & Van der Lippe, A. G. (2009). The effects of time-spatial flexibility and new working conditions on employees’ work-life balance. Community, Work and Family, 12(3), 279-297.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Peters, P., & Van der Lippe, T. (2007). The time-pressure reducing potential of telehomeworking: the Dutch case. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 430-447.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Peters, P., & Wildenbeest, M. (2010). Telewerken als hulpbron? ‘Flow’ en uitputting onder twee telewerkcategorieën vergeleken. Gedrag en Organisatie, 2, 97-117.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Popovici, V., & Popovici, A. -L. (2020). Remote work revolution: Current opportunities and challenges for organizations. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 468-472.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Profeta, A. M. (2020). Smart-working: Work flexibility without constraints. CESifo Working Papers, 1-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Ruhle, S. A., & Schmoll, R. (2021). COVID-19, telecommuting, and (virtual) sickness presenteeism: Working from home while ill during a pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 734106.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Sandoval-Reyes, J., Idrovo-Carlier, S., & Duque-Oliva, E. J. (2021). Remote work, work stress, and work-life during pandemic times: A Latin America situation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 7069.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Sociaal-Economische Raad (2022). Hybride werken. Advies 22/03. Sociaal-Economische Raad. https://www.ser.nl/-/media/ser/downloads/adviezen/2022/hybride-werken.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Shirmohammadi, M., Au, W. C., & Beigi, M. (2022). Remote work and work-life balance: Lessons learned from the covid-19 pandemic and suggestions for HRD practitioners. Human Resource Development International, 25, 163-181.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Shockley, K. M., & Allen, T. D. (2010). Investigating the missing link in flexible work arrangement utilization: An individual differences perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 131-142.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Steidelmüller, C., Meyer, S. C., & Müller, G. (2020). Home-based telework and presenteeism across Europe. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62, 998-1005.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Tavares, A. I. (2017). Telework and health effects review. International Journal of Healthcare, 3, 30-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Thulin, E., Vilhelmson, B., & Johansson, M. (2019). New telework, time pressure, and time use control in everyday life. Sustainability, 11, 1-17.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Tremblay, D. G., & Genin, E. (2007). The demand for telework of IT self-employed workers. The Journal of E-working, 1, 98-115.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Tripathi, P., & Burleson, W. (2012). Predicting creativity in the wild: Experience sample and sociometric modeling of teams. Paper presented at the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Van Yperen, N. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & de Jonge, K. M. M. (2014). Blended working: for whom it may (not) work. PLoS ONE, 9, e102921.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Vandenberghe, C. (2021). Telewerk tijdens de coronacrisis: één jaar verder. Over. Werk. Tijdschrift van het Steunpunt Werk, 3, 102-114.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Versantvoort, M., & Kraan, K. (2013). Leidt flexibilisering van werktijden en -plaats tot gezondheidsrisico’s? Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 29, 204-220.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Vyas, L., & Butakhieo, N. (2021). The impact of working from home during COVID-19 on work and life domains: an exploratory study on Hong Kong. Policy Design and Practice, 4, 59-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Yerkes, M. A., André, S. C. H., Besamusca, J. W., Kruyen, P. M., Remery, C. L. H. S., Van der Zwan, R., Beckers, D. G. J., & Geurts, S. A. E. (2020). ‘Intelligent’ lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown. PLOS ONE, 15(11), e0242249.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Warmerdam, C., Den Dulk, L., & Van Doorne-Huiskes, A. (2010). Werk-privébeleid: de visie van topmanagers. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 26, 8-26.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2023.2.006.CRAM
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error