oa Undoing scholarship: Towards an activist genealogy of the OA movement

References

1. Adair, C., & Nakamura, L.(2017). The digital afterlives of This bridge called my back: Woman of color feminism, digital labor, and networked pedagogy. American Literature, 89(2), 255–278. doi:10.1215/00029831‑3861505
   [Google Scholar]
2. Adema, J.(2015). Knowledge production beyond the book? Performing the scholarly monograph in contemporary digital culture (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Coventry University, Coventry.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Adema, J.(2018). The poethics of openness. In J.Adema, K.Marczewska, F.McDonlad, & V.Trettien (Eds.), The poethics of scholarship (pp. 16–23). Coventry: Post Office Press & Rope Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Adema, J., & Moore, S.A.(2018). Collectivity and collaboration: Imagining new forms of communality to create resilience in scholar-led publishing. Insights, 31(3), 1–11. doi:10.1629/uksg.399
   [Google Scholar]
5. Adema, J., & Hall, G.(2016). Posthumanities: The dark side of ‘The dark side of the digital’. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 19(2). doi:10.3998/3336451.0019.201
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ahmed, S.(2017). Living a feminist life. Durham: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Alexander, M.J., & Mohanty, C.T.(2010). Cartographies of knowledge and power. Transnational feminism as radical praxis. In A.Lock Swarr & R.Nagar (Eds.), Critical transnational feminist praxis (pp. 23–45). New York: State University of New York Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Amiran, E., Orr, E., & Unsworth, J. (1991, May). Postface: Positions on postmodernism. Postmodern Culture, 1(3). Retrieved from pomoculture.org/2013/09/26/postface-positions-on-postmodernism
   [Google Scholar]
9. Amiran, E., Orr, E., & Unsworth, J. (1990, September). Postface: Positions on postmodernism. Postmodern Culture, 1(1). Retrieved from pomoculture.org/2013/09/26/postface-positions-on-postmodernism-2
   [Google Scholar]
10. Canagarajah, A.S.(2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Choudry, A.(2020). Reflections on academia, activism, and the politics of knowledge and learning. The International Journal of Human Rights, 24(1), 28–45. doi:10.1080/13642987.2019.1630382
    [Google Scholar]
12. Christen, K.(2012). Does information really want to be free? Indigenous knowledge systems and the question of openness. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2870-2893.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Craig, C.J, Turcotte, J.F., & CoombeR.J.(2011). What’s feminist about open access? A relational approach to copyright in the academy. feminists@law, 1(1), 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dean, J.(2012). The communist horizon. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Drucker, J.(2009). Entity to event: From literal, mechanistic materiality to probabilistic materiality. Parallax, 15(4), 7–17.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Drucker, J.(2014). Distributed and conditional documents: Conceptualizing bibliographical alterities. MATLIT: Revista Do Programa de Doutoramento Em Materialidades Da Literatura, 2(1), 11–29.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Enszer, J.R., & Beins, A.(2018). Inter- and transnational feminist theory and practice in Triple jeopardy and Conditions. Women’s Studies, 47(1), 21–43. doi:10.1080/00497878.2017.1406353
    [Google Scholar]
18. Eve, M.P. (2013, March). Open access, ‘neoliberalism’, ‘impact’ and the privatisation of knowledge. [blog entry]. Retrieved from eve.gd/2013/03/10/open-access-neoliberalism-impact-and-the-privatisation-of-knowledge
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fernandez, M., Wilding, F., & Wright, M.(2002). Domain errors!: Cyberfeminist practices. New York: Autonomedia.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gilley, J.(2017). Ghost in the machine: Kitchen table press and the Third wave anthology that vanished. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 38(3), 141–163. doi:10.5250/fronjwomestud.38.3.0141
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gray, E., Trotter, H., & Willmers, M.(2012). A view from the South, scholarly communication in Africa: Aligning strategy and technology for increased visibility of Southern African research. Presented at IAMCR 2012, Durban, South Africa.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hall, G.(2008). Digitize this book!Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hall, G. (2019, February). Media gifts – The Left can’t meme? [blog post]. Retrieved from garyhall.squarespace.com/journal/2019/2/18/the-left-cant-meme.html
    [Google Scholar]
24. hooks, b. (1990, September). Post modern blackness. Postmodern Culture, 1(1). Retrieved from pmc.iath.virginia.edu/text-only/issue.990/hooks.990
    [Google Scholar]
25. Jeffries, J., & Kember, S.(2019). Whose book is it anyway? A view from elsewhere on publishing, copyright and creativity. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jones, A., Eubanks, V., & Smith, B. (Eds.). (2014). Ain’t gonna let nobody turn me around: Forty years of movement building with Barbara Smith. New York: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kember, S. (2014a, April). Opening out from open access: Writing and publishing in response to neoliberalism. Ada New Media 4. Retrieved from adanewmedia.org/2014/04/issue4-kember Kember, S. (2014b). Why write? Feminism, publishing and the politics of communication. New Formations, 83(2014), 99–116.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kolko, B., Nakamura, L., & Rodman, G.(2000). Race in cyberspace. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lawson, S.(2018). Open access policy in the UK: From neoliberalism to the commons (Doctoral dissertation). Birkbeck, University of London, London. doi:10.17613/ktz2‑w249
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lury, C., & Wakeford, N.(2012). Inventive methods: The happening of the social. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Mandler, P.(2014). Open access: A perspective from the humanities. Insights, 27(2). Retrieved from insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/20487754.89/?toggle_hypothesis=on
    [Google Scholar]
32. Méndez Cota, G.(2018). On being heard: The content and the form of geopolitics. In Culture Machine (Eds.). The geopolitics of open (pp. 16–25). Coventry: Post Office Press, Rope Press & Culture Machine.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Marczewska, K.(2018). The horizon of the publishable in/as open access: From poethics to praxis. In J.Adema, K.Marczewska, F.McDonald, & W.Trettien (Eds.), The poethics of scholarship (pp. 6–13). Coventry: Post Office Press & Rope Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mignolo, W.(1995). The darker side of the Renaissance: Literacy, territoriality, and colonization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Moore, S.A.(2017). A genealogy of open access: Negotiations between openness and access to research. Revue Française Des Sciences de l’information et de La Communication, 11, 1–15. doi:10.4000/rfsic.3220
    [Google Scholar]
36. Moore, S.A. (2019a). Revisiting ‘the 1990s debutante’: Scholarled publishing and the pre-history of the open access movement. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2019, 1–11. doi:10.17613/41h8‑j423
    [Google Scholar]
37. Moore, S.A. (2019b). Common struggles: Policy-based vs. scholar-led approaches to open access in the humanities (Doctoral dissertation). King’s College, London. doi:10.17613/st5m‑cx33
    [Google Scholar]
38. Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (Eds.) (1983). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (2nd ed.). New York: Kitchen Table.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Moraga, C. (1983a). Refugees of a world on fire. Foreword to the 2nd edition. In C.Moraga & G.Anzaldúa (Eds.), This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. New York: Kitchen Table.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Moraga, C. (1983b). Preface. In C.Moraga, & G.Anzaldúa (Eds.) This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (pp. xiii–xv). New York: Kitchen Table.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Morini, L. (2019, October). Research as a game of empire. [blog post]. Retrieved from researchwhisperer.org/2019/10/22/research-as-a-game-of-empire
    [Google Scholar]
42. Moten, F., & Harney, S.(2013). The undercommons: Fugitive planning & black studies. New York: Autonomedia.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Okerson, A.(1992). Publishing through the network: The 1990s debutante. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 23(3), 170–177.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Precarias a la deriva. (2004). A la deriva por los circuitos de la precariedad femenina. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Puig de la Bellacasa, M.(2017). Matters of care. Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Santos, B. de S.(2018). The end of the cognitive empire: The coming of age of epistemologies of the South. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Shorish, Y., & ChanL. (2019, October). Co-creating open infrastructure to epistemic diversity and knowledge equity [blog entry]. Retrieved from blog.scholarled.org/co-creating-open-infrastructure-to-support-epistemic-diversity-and-knowledge-equity
    [Google Scholar]
48. Simpson, L.B.(2011). Dancing on our turtle’s back: Stories of Nishnaabeg re-creation, resurgence, and a new emergence. Winnipeg: ARP Books.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Sivanandan, A.(2005). The rules of the game? In European Civil Liberties Network (Ed.), ECLN essays. Retrieved from.ecln.org/essays/essay-6.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
50. Smith, B.(1989). A press of our own. Kitchen table: Women of color press. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 10(3), 11–13. doi:10.2307/3346433
    [Google Scholar]
51. Smith, L.T.(1999). Decolonizing methodologies. Research and indigenous people. London: Zed Books.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Sousa, L. P. de Q., Pessoa, R. R.(2019). Humans, nonhuman thers, matter and language: A discussion from posthumanist and decolonial perspectives. Trabalhos Em Linguística Aplicada, 58(2), 520–543. doi:10.1590/010318135373715822019
    [Google Scholar]
53. Tirler, J.(2018). Precarias a la deriva. Krisis 2018, 2. Retrieved from krisis.eu/precarias-a-la-deriva
    [Google Scholar]
54. Tkacz, N.(2015). Wikipedia and the politics of openness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Vimalassery, M., Pegues, J. H., & Goldstein, A.(2016). Introduction: On colonial unknowing. Theory & Event, 19(4). Retrieved from muse.jhu.edu/article/633283
    [Google Scholar]
56. Willinsky, J.(2005). The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science. First Monday, 10(8). doi:10.5210/fm.v10i8.1265
    [Google Scholar]