Caring about the elephants in feminist classrooms | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publicaties
  3. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies
  4. Volume 27, Issue 2/3
  5. Artikel
Volume 27, Issue 2/3
  • ISSN: 1388-3186
  • E-ISSN: 2352-2437
file format pdf download PDF

Samenvatting

Abstract

This article explores how feminist teachers can engage with affective pedagogies when teaching intersectional gender studies. In the context of global corporate universities that emphasise action plans on diversity, equality, and inclusion, and alongside a rise in anti-gender and anti-diversity politics both within society and on campuses, feminist scholars encounter challenges in navigating affective contestations and tensions when teaching intersectional gender studies. These tensions can both evoke uncomfortable atmospheres and offer hopeful glimpses of societal changes and solidarities. In addressing this, we employ the idiom of ‘the elephant in the room’ to exploring how affective tensions emerge in the classroom and how feminist teachers may respond to and care about them. Drawing on literature on affective pedagogies, we conceptualise affects as intensities that move within and infuse feminist classrooms and analytically unpack two experiences of elephants emerging when teaching an intersectional gender studies programme at a Danish university. Specifically, we offer two takes on affective pedagogies that we name ‘swaying the elephant’ and ‘holding the elephant’ and discuss the ways in which feminist teachers can nurture ethico-political and affirmative practices in education.

© Mante Vertelyte, Merethe Riggelsen Gjørding, Iram Khawaja, Mie Plotnikof, Dorthe Staunæs & Jette Sandager. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-ND 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2024.2-3.011.VERT
2024-09-01
2024-09-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13883186/27/2/3/TVGN2024.2-3.011.VERT.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2024.2-3.011.VERT&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abdellatif, A., Aldossari, M., Boncori, I., Callahan, J., Na Ayudhya, U.C., Chaudhry, S., Kivinen, N., Sarah Liu, S.J., Utoft, E.H., Vershinina, N., Yarrow, E., & Pullen, A. (2021). Breaking the mold: Working through our differences to vocalise the sound of change. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(5), 1956–1979.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Acker, S., & Wagner, A. (2019). Feminist scholars working around the neoliberal university. Gender and Education, 31(1), 62–81. doi:10.1080/09540253.2017.1296117
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahenkorah, E. (2020). Safe and brave spaces don’t work (and what you can do instead). Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@elise.k.ahen/safe-and-brave-spaces-dont-work-and-what-you-can-do-instead-f265aa339aff
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Durham: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Ahmed, S., & Swan, E. (2006). Doing diversity. Policy Futures in Education, 4(2), 96–100.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Amrouche, C., Brechenridge, J., BrewisN.D., Burdellaro, O., Breiding Hansen, M., Pedersen, C.H., Plotnikof, M., & Pullen, A. (2018). Powerful writing. Ephemera: Theory & politics in organization, 18(4), 881–900.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. BaudelaireU., Berry, R.T., & Jupp, C.J. (2016). On the elephant in the room: Toward a generative politics of place on race in academic discourse. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(8), 989 – 1001. doi:10.1080/09518398.2016.1174903
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Beasley, C. (2010). The elephant in the room: Heterosexuality in critical gender/sexuality studies. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 18(3), 204–209. doi:10.1080/08038740.2010.499100
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bilge, S. (2014). Whitening intersectionality. Evanescence of race in intersectionality scholarship. In D.H.Wulf & A.Lentin (Eds.), Racism and sociology (pp. 175–206). Zürich: Lit Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Brøgger, K. (2016). The rule of mimetic desire in higher education: Governing through naming, shaming and faming. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 72–91. doi:10.1080/01425692.2015.1096191
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Burke, J.P. (2017). Difference in higher education pedagogies: Gender, emotion and shame. Gender and Education, 29(4), 430–444. doi:10.1080/09540253.2017.1308471
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Clarke, K., & Vertelyte, M. (2023). Educational challenges for Nordic exceptionalism: Epistemic injustice in the absence of antiracist education. In E.L.Engebretsen & M.Liinason (Eds.), Transforming identities in contemporary Europe (pp. 33–50). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Clough, P. (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cvetkovich, A. (2012). Depression: A Public Feeling. Manchester: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dahl, U. (2021). Nordic academic feminism and whiteness as epistemic habit. In S.Keskinen, P.Stoltz, & D.Mulinari (Eds.), Feminisms in the Nordic region. Neoliberalism, nationalism and decolonial critique (pp. 113–132). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: The Athlone Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Dernikos, P.B., Lesko, N., McCall, S., & Niccolini, D.A. (2020). Mapping the affective turn in education: Theory, research, and pedagogies. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. El-Tayeb, F. (2011). European others: Queering ethnicity in postnational Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Eriksen, K.G. (2020). Discomforting presence in the classroom: The affective technologies of race, racism and whiteness. Whiteness and Education, 5(1), 1–20. doi:10.1080/23793406.2020.1812110
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist realism: Is there no alternative?. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Flemming, P., Olaison, L., Plotnikof, M., Pors, J., & Pullen, A. (2022). The future of critique in the business school is the future of the business school. Ephemera, 22(3), 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Gregg, M., & Seigworth, J.G. (2010). The affect theory reader. London: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Grosland, T.J. (2019). Through laughter and through tears: Emotional narratives to antiracist pedagogy. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 22(3), 301–318. doi:10.1080/13613324.2018.1468750
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Grosz, E.A. (2019). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Gullach, E.B., & Acharya, M. (2021). Me, who? (Un)telling whiteness within and beyond MeToo. Kvinder, Køn og Forskning, 29(2), 74–76. doi:10.7146/kkf.v29i2.124900
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Durham: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Harlap, Y., & Riese, H. (2022). We don’t throw stones, we throw flowers: Race discourse and race evasiveness in the Norwegian university classroom, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 45(7), 1218–1238. doi:10.1080/01419870.2021.1904146
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Haug, F. (2020). Memory-work as a method of social science research: A detailed rendering of memory-work method. Retrieved from http://www.friggahaug.inkrit.de/documents/memorywork-researchguidei7.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hernández, R., Velásquez, E., & Grosfoguel, R. (2016). Decolonizing the Westernised university: Interventions in philosophy of education from within and without. Lanham: The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Holck, L., & Muhr, S.L. (2017). Unequal solidarity? Towards a norm-critical approach to welfare logics. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(1), 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2016.11.001
     [Google Scholar]
  34. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hvenegård-Lassen, K., & Staunæs, D. (2021). Shooting the elephant in the (prayer) room: Politics of moods, racial hauntologies and idiomatic diffractions. In V.Bozalek, M.Zembylas, S.Motata, & D.Holscher (Eds.), Higher education hauntologies: Living with ghosts for a justice-to-come (pp. 50–62). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Hytten, K., & Warren, J. (2010). Engaging whiteness: How racial power gets reified in education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(1), 65–89. doi:10.1080/0951839032000033509a
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Juelskjær, M. (2020). Mattering pedagogy in precarious times of (un)learning. Matter. Journal of New Materialist Research, 1(1), 52–79. doi:10.1344/jnmr.v1i1.30067
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Juelskjær, M., & Staunæs, D. (2016). Orchestrating intensities and rhythms: How post-psychologies are assisting new educational standards and reforming subjectivities. Theory & Psychology, 26(2), 182–201. doi:10.1177/0959354316634217
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Khawaja, I. (2022). Memory work as engaged critical pedagogy: Creating collaborative spaces for reflections on racialisation, privilege and whiteness. NordicJournal of Social Research, 13(1), 94–107. doi:10.18261/njsr.13.1.8
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Khawaja, I., & Lagermann, L.C. (2023). (Farve)blinde vinkler- om racialisering, andetgørelse og ulighed i pædagogisk praksis. Copenhagen: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne..
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Khawaja, I., Staunæs, D., & Vertelyte, M. (2023). How racial matter comes to matter: Memory work, animacy and childhood dolls. Body & Society, 29(3), 29–54. doi:10.1177/1357034X231189178
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Krøjer, J., Muhr, S.L., Plotnikof, M. et al. (2024). Sexisme på arbejde. København: DJØF Forlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Lapiņa, L., Singla, R., Suárez-Krabbe, J., Tornius, K., & Horn, L. (2023). How is the anti/not/un-racist university a radical idea?: Experiences from the Solidarity Initiative at Roskilde University. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning, 36(2), 168–177. doi:10.7146/kkf.v36i2.132553
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Lund, W.B.R. (2023). Affective alignment and epistemic polarization: The case of feminist research in the neoliberalised university. Gender and Education, 35(5), 437–453. doi:10.1080/09540253.2023.2215067
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Madsen, M. (2023). Set in motion by data: Human and data intra-actions in educational governance. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 44(2), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2021.1984211
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. McCormack, D.P. (2018). Atmospheric things: on the allure of elemental envelopment. Durham: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Muhr, S.L., & Plotnikof, M. (2018). Unblinding privilege: Repoliticizing the idea(l) s of an equal society. M@n@gement, 21(3), 1107–1109.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Niccolini, A. (2016). Animate affects: Censorship, reckless pedagogies, and beautiful feelings. Gender and Education, 28(2), 230–249. doi:10.1080/09540253.2015.1121205
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Nielsen, G. (2019). Radically democratising education? New student movements, equality and engagement in common, yet plural, worlds. Research in Education, 103(1), 85–100. doi:10.1177/0034523719842605
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Paternotte, D. (2019). Gender studies and the dismantling of critical knowledge in Europe. Academic Freedom around the World, 105(4), 28–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Peters, M.A. (2019). Manifesto for the postcolonial university. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(2), 142–148. doi:10.1080/00131857.2017.1388660
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Pető, A. (2018). Attack on freedom of education in Hungary. The case of gender studies. Engenderings LSE Blog. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3898856
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Plotnikof, M., Muhr, S.L., Holck, L., & Just, S.N. (2021). Repoliticizing diversity work? Exploring the performative potentials of norm-critical activism. Gender, Work & Organization, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12771
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Plotnikof, M., & Utoft, E.H. (2022). The ‘new normal’ of academia in pandemic times: Resisting toxicity through care. Gender, Work and Organization, 29(4), 1259–1271. doi:10.1111/gwao.12778
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Popkewitz, T.S. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Probyn, E. (2004). Teaching bodies: Affects in the classroom. Body & Society, 10(4), 21–43. doi:10.1177/1357034X04047854
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2012). ‘Nothing comes without its world’: Thinking with care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Puwar, N. (2004). Space invaders: Race, gender, and bodies out of place. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Raffnsøe, S., Staunæs, D., & Bank, M. (2022). Affirmative critique. Ephemera: Theory & politics in organization, 22(3), 183–217. Retrieved from http://www.ephemerajournal.org/contribution/affirmative-critique
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Sandler, J. & Rao, A. (2012). The elephant in the room and the dragons at the gate: Strategising for gender equality in the 21st century. Gender & Development, 20(3), 547–562. doi:10.1080/13552074.2012.731741
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Skewes, L. (2023). Men run academic track; women jump sexist hurdles. In M.Lunqvist, A.Simonsson, & K.Widegren (Eds.), Re-imagining sexual harassment: Perspectives from the Nordic region (pp. 92–116). Bristol: Policy Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Smyth, J. (2017). The toxic university. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Spinoza, B. (2020 [1677]). Spinoza’s Ethics (Translated by E.George; edited by ClareCarlisle). Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9780691197043
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Staunæs, D. (2016). Notes on inventive methodologies and affirmative critiques of an affective edu-future. Research in Education, 96(1), 62–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Staunæs, D., & Mengel, P. (2023). Performative cartographies: Re-animating the archive. In A.Y.Jackson and L.A.Mazzei (Eds.), Post-foundational approaches to inquiry (pp. 85–99). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Taylor, Y. & Lahad, K. (2018). Feeling academic in the neoliberal university: Feminist flights, fights and failures. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Utoft, E.H. (2021). Maneuvering within postfeminism: A study of gender equality practitioners in Danish academia. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(1), 301–317.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Vertelyte, M. (2023). ‘Have we lost our sense of humour?!’ Affective senses of racial joking in Danish schools. Social Identities, 29(2), 205–219. doi:10.1080/13504630.2023.2208067
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Zembylas, M. (2016). Making sense of the complex entanglement between emotion and pedagogy: Contributions of the affective turn. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(3), 539–550.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Zembylas, M., & McGlynn, C. (2012). Discomforting pedagogies: Emotional tensions, ethical dilemmas and transformative possibilities. British Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 41–59. doi:10.1080/01411926.2010.523779
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2024.2-3.011.VERT
Loading
Keyword(s): affective pedagogies; ethics of care; feminist classroom; intersectional gender studies

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error