oa ‘Ik spreek namens miljoenen Nederlanders’

References

1. Andone, C.(2015). Engagement et non-engagement dans les appels à la majorité par des hommes politiques. Argumentation et analyse du discours, 15, 13 pp. Te downloaden via: https://aad.revues.org/2021#tocto1n3
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andone, C.(2016). Argumentative patterns in the political domain: The case of European parliamentary committees of inquiry. Argumentation, 30, 45-60.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blassnig, S., Büchel, F., Ernst, N., & Engesser, S.(2018). Populism and informal fallacies: An analysis of right-wing populist rhetoric in election campaigns. Argumentation, 33(1), 107-136.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boogaart, R., Jansen, H., & Van Leeuwen, M. (te verschijnen). The language of argumentation. Cham: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Eemeren, F.H. van(2018). Argumentation theory: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Cham: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Eemeren, F.H. van, Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B.(2009). Conceptions of reasonableness. Dordrecht: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Eemeren, F.H. van, Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B.(2015). The disguised ad baculum fallacy empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with threats. In B.Garssen, D.Godden, G.Mitchell & F.Snoeck Henkemans (red.), Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1396-1407). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Eemeren, F.H. van, Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B.(2012). The disguised abusive ad hominem empirically investigated: Strategic manoeuvring with direct personal attacks. Thinking and Reasoning, 18(3), 344-364.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Eemeren, F.H. van, & Garssen, B.(2019). En dan zit je met de gebakken peren! Strategisch manoeuvreren met het argumentum ad consequentiam. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 41(1), 47-60.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R.(2015). Making the best of argumentative discourse. In F. H.van Eemeren (red.), Reasonableness an effectiveness in argumentative discourse. Fifty contributions to the development of pragma-dialectics (pp. 543-554). Cham: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Eemeren, F.H. van, & Snoeck Henkemans, A.F.(2016). Argumentatie. Inleiding in het analyseren en beoordelen van betogen (5e herz. dr.)Groningen: Noordhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Freeman, J.B.(1995). The appeal to popularity and presumption by common knowledge. In H.V.Hansen and R.C.Pinto (red.), Fallacies: Classical and contemporary readings. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Godden, D.(2008). On common knowledge and ad populum: Acceptance as grounds for acceptability. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 41(2),101-129.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Haaften, T. van, & Leeuwen, M. van (te verschijnen). Suggesting outsider status by behaving improperly: The linguistic realisation of a populist rhetorical strategy in Dutch Parliament. In I.van der Geest, H.Jansen & B.van Klink (red.), Vox populi: Populism as a rhetorical and democratic challenge. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Jansen, H.(2018). Ad populum arguments in a political context. In S.Oswald & D.Maillat (red.), Argumentation and Inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017, Volume II (pp. 423-436). London: College Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Jansen, H.(2019). De invloed van het standpunt op de beoordeling van ad populum-argumentatie. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 41, 143-157.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jansen, H., & Leeuwen, M. van(2018). Presentational choice in ad populum argumentation. In B.Garssenet al. (red.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 573-582). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jansen, H. & Leeuwen, M. van (ingediend). Populist argumentative style: Geert Wilders’s use of the populist argument. Journal of Argumentation in Context.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jansen, H. & Snoeck Henkemans, A.F.(2020). Argumentative use and strategic function of the expression ‘not for nothing’. Argumentation, 34(2), 143-162.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jansen, H. (te verschijnen).“The people want it, we’ll do it.” Analysis and evaluation of the populist argument in the context of deliberation. Journal Argumentation in Context.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Johnson, R.H., & Blair, J.A.(2006). Logical Self-Defense. New York etc.: Idea Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kienpointner(2003). Populistische Topik. Zu einigen rhetorischen Strategien Jörg Haiders. Rhetorik, 21(1), 119-140.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Leeuwen, M. van(2014). Systematic stylistic analysis. The use of a checklist. In B.Kaal, I.Maks & A.van Elfrinkhof (red.), From Text to Political Positions. Text analysis across disciplines (pp. 225-244). Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Leeuwen, M. van(2015). Stijl en politiek. Een taalkundig-stilistische benadering van Nederlandse parlementaire toespraken. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Leeuwen, M. van(2016). ‘Man van het volk’. Stijl en imago van Geert Wilders. Tekstblad22(2), 6-11.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Leeuwen, M. van, & Vliet, F. van(2019). De ‘stem van het volk’. Populisme en perspectief. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing41(1), 173-187.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Minot, W.S.(1981). A rhetorical view of fallacies: Ad hominem and ad populum. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 11, 222-235.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C.R.(2017). Populisme (Elementaire deeltjes 51). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Müller, J.-W.(2017). Wat is populisme?Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Nieuw Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Nolt, J.E.(1984). Informal logic. Possible worlds and imagination. New York, etc.: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pauwels, T.(2014). Populism in Western Europe: Comparing Belgium, Germany and The Netherlands. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Reisigl, M.(2006). The dynamics of right-wing populist argumentation in Austria. In: F.H.van Eemeren, J.A.Blair, C.A.Willard & B.Garssen (red.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). Amsterdam: Rozenberg.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Vossen, K.(2016). The Power of Populism. Geert Wilders and the Party for Freedom in the Netherlands. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Walton, D.N.(1992). The place of emotion in argument. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Walton, D.N.(1999). Appeal to popular opinion. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Walton, D.N.(2006). Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Walton, D.N., Reed, C., & Macagno, F.(2008). Argumentation schemes. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]