- Home
- A-Z Publications
- Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte
- Previous Issues
- Volume 111, Issue 1, 2019
Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte - Volume 111, Issue 1, 2019
Volume 111, Issue 1, 2019
Language:
English
-
-
De immuniteit van non-combattanten en irreguliere oorlogvoering
More LessAbstract Non-combatant Immunity and Irregular Warfare The Ethical Problem of Human Shields One of the basic principles of the Just War Theory is that of non-combatant immunity. Basically, this principle is about protecting the civilian population against the violence of war. Now, despite the fact that this principle is firmly ingrained in our collective moral conscience and in international humanitarian law, the truth is that the ci Read More
-
-
-
Over ‘caritas’ en de belofte van de ‘juiste intentie’
More LessAbstract On ‘caritas’ and the promise of ‘right intent’ Back to the roots of justice in war In classical Just War texts, the criterion of ‘right intent’ is considered a key concept with regard to the justice of a war as such, since it refers to the basic iustus disposition from which the other criteria (ad bellum as well as in bello and post bellum) should be applied. However, in current JW debates, determined to a large extent by Tradition Read More
-
-
-
Mondiale rechtvaardigheid afdwingen
More LessAbstract Enforcing Global Justice: War, Necessity and Rights of Armed Resistance of the World’s Poor Global justice theorists have long focused on the nature and grounds of duties of the affluent to alleviate the plight of the global poor and to realize justice worldwide. The last few years has seen a flurry of work that shifts perspective to the agency and remedial rights of the global poor. Suppose due assistance is not forthco Read More
-
-
-
De oorlog in de theorie van de rechtvaardige oorlog
More LessAbstract The war in just war theory Just war theory has an ancient pedigree. While the substantive norms and application of those norms have always been debated, the debate today is entirely polarized. So polarized, that there seems to be a ‘war’ raging in just war theory. On one side are representatives of Walzer’s conventional position and on the other side so-called revisionists as McMahan, Fabre, Rodin, and Frowe. This Read More
-
-
-
Ethiek voor Cyberkrijg en Cyberkrijgers
More LessAbstract Ethics for Cyber War and Cyber Warriors Although some claim that the term cyber war is merely metaphorical, there are good reasons to see cyber war as a form of warfare – even if it is not war as we have hitherto known it. This poses the question whether the principles of the Just War Tradition, which claims to offer an alternative for pacifism and realism, apply to this specific kind of war too. This article argues that Read More
-
-
-
Beïnvloedt het gebruik van gewapende drones de kans op succes in de strijd tegen het terrorisme?
More LessAbstract Does the use of armed drones influence the chance of success in the fight against terrorism? In this article we analyse whether armed drones influence the chance of success in the fight against terrorism. The reasonable chance of success principle is a just war theory principle, focusing on the likelihood of reaching the war objectives. Without a reasonable chance of winning the war, it is better not to start it. This Read More
-
-
-
‘Als in een veergezicht’
More LessAbstract ‘As in a view from afar’. Vondel’s epistemological objections to Spinoza’s circle From a philosophical and theological stance, Spinoza and Vondel are traditionally portrayed as downright antipodes. Whereas Spinoza is seen as a pre-eminent representative of ‘radical Enlightenment’, Vondel is generally considered as a rather reactionary author who does not fit at all in this radical version of Enlightenment. The central Read More
-
Most Read This Month
Article
content/journals/00025275
Journal
10
5
false
en
