oa De beste arts is ook filosoof

References

1. Boudon-Millot, V.2007. ‘Que l’excellent médecin est aussi philosophe, texte établi, traduit et annoté’, in V.Boudon-Millot, Galien, Tome I, Parijs, 235-314.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Kühn, C. G.1821-1833. Claudii Galeni opera Omnia, Leipzig.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Müller, I. von.1891. Galeni Scripta Minora. Deel 2, Lipsiae, 1-8 (editio minor); latere herdruk Amsterdam 1967.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Wenkebach, E.1933. ‘Der hippokratische Arzt als das Ideal Galens. Neue Textgestaltung seiner Schrift Ὅτι ὁ ἄριστος ὶατρος καὶ φιλόσοφος', Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und Medizin. Deel 3.4, 155-175.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Allen, P.S. en H. M.Allen (eds). 1926. Erasmus, Opus Epistolarum Des. Erasmi Roterodami, deel 4, Oxford.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boudon-Millot, V., J.Jouanna en A.Pietrobelli. 2010. Galien Tome IV. Ne pas se chagriner, Parijs.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Eijk, P. J. van der. 1995. ‘Aristotle on “distinguished physicians” and on the medical significance of dreams’, in P. J.van der Eijk, H. F. J.Horstmanshoff, P. H.Schrijvers (eds), Ancient Medicine in its Socio-Cultural Context. Deel 2, Amsterdam en Atlanta, 447-459.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Jouanna, J. 1997. ‘La lecture de l’éthique Hippocratique par Galien,’ in H.Flashar en J.Jouanna (eds), Médecine et morale dans l’Antiquité, Genève, 211-253. Herdrukt als ‘Galen’s Reading of Hippocratic Ethics,’ in J.Jouanna. 2012. Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen. Selected papers, Leiden, 261-286.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Keyser, P. en J.Scarborough (eds). 2018. The Oxford Handbook of Science and Medicine in the Classical World, Oxford.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Menn, S. 2003. ‘The Discourse on Method and the Tradition of Intellectual Autobiography,’ in J.Miller en B.Inwood (eds), Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy, Cambridge, 141-191.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Nussbaum, M. C.1994. The Therapy of Desire. Theory and practice in Hellenistic ethics, Princeton en Oxford (met herdrukken; de editie van 2009 bevat een nieuwe inleiding).
    [Google Scholar]
12. Nutton, V. 2005. ‘The Fatal Embrace. Galen and the history of ancient medicine’, Science in Context18.1, 111-121.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Perilli, L. 2012. ‘A Risky Enterprise. The Aldine edition of Galen, the failures of the editors and the shadow of Erasmus of Rotterdam’, Early Science and Medicine17, 446-466.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Rosenthal, F. 1956. ‘An Ancient Commentary on the Hippocratic Oath’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine30, 52-87.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Tieleman, T.2018a. ‘Epicurus and His Circle. Philosophy, medicine and the sciences’, in P.Keyser en J.Scarborough (eds), 257-268.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Tieleman, T. 2018b. ‘Stoicism and the Natural World. Philosophy and science’, in P.Keyser en J.Scarborough (eds), 677-698.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Tieleman, T. 2018c. ‘Medische innovatie in de Grieks-Romeinse wereld. De sectie op menselijke lichamen als praktijkgeval’, Lampas51, 325-339.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Tieleman, T. 2020. ‘Galen’s Self-Understanding and the Platonic Phaedrus’, in S.Delcomminette, P.D’Hoine en M.-A.Gavray (eds), The Reception of Plato’s Phaedrus from Antiquity to the Renaissance, Berlijn, 25-39.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Tieleman, T.2022. Galen’s Notion of Dialectic,’ in R. J.Hankinson en M.Havrda (eds), Galen’s Epistemology. Experience, reason, and method in ancient medicine, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]