2004
Volume 28, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1384-5829
  • E-ISSN: 2352-118X

Abstract

Abstract

In J.J. Voskuil’s monumental seven-volume novel series (1996-2000), main protagonist Maarten Koning devotes himself to creating an ‘atlas of folk culture’ at a research institute for Dutch culture. The novelistic cycle minutely describes the ‘microcosm’ of a scientific community and at the same time offers a broad panorama of the Netherlands during the period it covers (from the fifties to the eighties of the last century). In this article, I situate at the beginning of the present information age, where switching between different forms of attention becomes important as a new form of adaptation. I read the cycle as an early ‘database novel’, in which literary prose is characterized by seriality, inclusivity, quantitative forms of representation and (seeming) endlessness. I compare the card system of the Maarten’s ‘Folk Atlas’ with the series as a whole, and the labor that Maarten performs with that of the reader. The challenge of sorting the relevant from the irrelevant plays a central role on several levels: thematic (intradiegetic), creative (the writing process) and hermeneutic (the labor of reading). On all these levels, I will argue, an openness for seemingly irrelevant information is thematized or presupposed, and an attitude of tolerance for such apparent irrelevance amounts to a productive reading. With reference to Catherine Malabou’s distinction between flexibility and plasticity, I argue that novels like offer the reader a potential of resistance against the demands of the attention economy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NEDLET2023.2.003.VEN
2023-12-01
2024-11-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13845829/28/2/NEDLET2023.2.003.VEN.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/NEDLET2023.2.003.VEN&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ackermans, H. en I.van de Ven, ‘Electronic Literature in the Database & The Database in Electronic Literature. Towards a Digital-*Hermeneutics Approach’, in: КОММУНИКАЦИИ. МЕДИА. ДИЗАЙН /Communications. Media. Design, 4, 2019, 4, 5-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Agnoli, S., L.Franchin, E.Rubaltelli en G.E.Corazza, ‘An Eye Tracking Analysis of Irrelevance Processing as Moderator of Openness and Creative Performance’, in: Creativity Research Journal, 27, 2015, 2, 125-132.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alphen, E. van, Staging the Archive. Art and Photography in the Age of New Media. London, Reaktion Books, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barthes, R., De lichtende kamer. Aantekening over de fotografie. Amsterdam, De Arbeiderspers, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernaerts, L., ‘Totaalpakketten. De romancyclus in de Nederlandse literatuur – een verkenning in theorie en praktijk’, in: Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal-en Letterkunde, 138, 2022, 2, 130-156.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blom, O., ‘J.J. Voskuil: Het Bureau is een gevangenis’, in: Trouw, 29januari1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brooks, P., Reading for the Plot. Desing and Intention in Narrative. Harvard, Harvard University Press, 1984.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brouwers, T., ‘J.J. Voskuil’, in: S.Bax, H.Brems, T.van Deel en A.Zuiderent (red.), Kritisch Lexicon van de Moderne Nederlandstalige Literatuur, mei2011, https://www.dbnl.org/tekst/zuid004krit01_01/kll00604.php, laatst geraadpleegd 28september2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cage, J., Silence. Lectures and Writings. Middletown, University Press, 1961.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cervantes Saavedra, M. de, De geestrijke ridder Don Quichot van de Mancha. Amsterdam, Querido, 1941 [1605].
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Combat, K., ‘Een duik in Het Bureau van J.J. Voskuil. Mooie zinnen, mooie passages’, in: Tsjip/Letteren, 7, 1997, 45-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Crary, J., Suspensions of Perception. Attention, Spectacle and Modern Culture. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Davenport, T.H. en J.C.Beck, The Attention Economy. Understanding the New Currency of Business. Harvard, Harvard Business Press, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dirks, B., ‘Het Bureau knaagt’, in: de Volkskrant, 16mei1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Edmond, J., ‘How Scholars Read Now. When the Signal Is the Noise’, in: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 12, 2018, 1, 1-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fairchild, C., ‘Building the Authentic Celebrity. The “Idol” Phenomenon in the Attention Economy’, in: Popular Music and Society, 30, 2007, 3, 355-375.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fontijn, J., Op bezoek bij J.J. Voskuil. Amsterdam, Van Oorschot, 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Genette, G., Narrative Discourse. An Essay in Method. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Goossens, J., ‘Het wetenschappelijk bedrijf in Voskuils roman Het Bureau’, in: Literatuur, 14, 1997, 3, 43-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Grunberg, A., ‘Bij een roman telt alleen het resultaat. De polemiek over Het Bureau van J.J. Voskuil’, in: dez., De troost van de slapstick. Amsterdam, Nijgh & Van Ditmar, 1998, 137-152.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hagen, A.M., ‘Het Meertens-Instituut anno 2001’, in: Ons Erfdeel, 44, 2001, 3, 330-336.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Harms, I., ‘Het Bureau slaat terug. De personages van J.J. Voskuil over hun auteur’, in: Vrij Nederland, 23november1996.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Harms, I., ‘Het tragische leven van de échte Anton Beerta’, in: Vrij Nederland, 11november2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hayles, N.K., ‘Hyper and Deep Attention. The Generational Divide in Cognitive Modes’, in: Profession, 13, 2007a, 187-199.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hayles, N.K., ‘Narrative and Database. Natural Symbionts’, in: PMLA, 22, 2007b, 5, 1603-1607.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Herman, D. e.a. (red.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. London, Routledge, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Labov, W., Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Letzler, D., The Cruft of Fiction. Mega-novels and the Science of Paying Attention. Lincoln, Nebraska University Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lijster, T., ‘J.J. Voskuil na de lockdown’, in: De Groene Amsterdammer, 14juli2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lin, R., A.Levordashka en S.Utz, ‘Ambient Intimacy on Twitter’, in: Cyberpsychology. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 10, 2016, 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Malabou, C., What Should We Do With Our Brain?New York, Fordham University Press, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Malaspina, C., The Epistemology of Noise. Berkeley: Bloomsbury Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Manovich, L., The Language of the New Media. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. McGann, J., ‘Database, Interface, and Archival Fever’, in: PMLA, 22, 2007, 5, 1588-1591.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. McLuhan, M., The Gutenberg Galaxy. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ngai, S., Ugly feelings. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Oostendorp, M. van, ‘Heel dikke boeken schrijven voor de eeuwigheid’, in: Neerlandistiek, 7september2020, https://neerlandistiek.nl/2020/09/heel-dikke-boeken-schrijven-voor-de-eeuwigheid/, laatst geraadpleegd 28september2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Paasonen, S., Dependent, Distracted, Bored. Affective Formations in Networked Media. Boston, MIT Press, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Paul, C., ‘The Database as System and Cultural Form. Anatomies of Cultural Narratives’, in: V.Vesna (red.), Database Aesthetics. Art in the Age of Information Overflow. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2007, 95–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Peters, A., Nog even een ommetje. Beschouwingen over Het Bureau van J.J. Voskuil. Amsterdam, Van Oorschot, 2000a.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Peters, A., ‘“Nu Het Bureau af is, leid ik geen dubbelleven meer.” Interview met J.J. Voskuil’, in: Tirade, 2000b, https://www.dbnl.org/tekst/_tir001200101_01/_tir001200101_01_0017.php, laatst geraadpleegd 28september2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Phillips, N., ‘Distraction as Liveliness of Mind. A Cognitive Approach to Characterization in Jane Austen’, in: P.Leveragen (red.), Theory of Mind and Literature. West Lafayette, Purdue University Press, 2011, 105-122.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Rabinowitz, P., Before Reading. Narrative Conventions and the Politics of Interpretation. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Rooijakkers, G., ‘Is dit mijn leven? Fiction en faction in Het Bureau’, in: Volkskundig Bulletin, 25, 1999, 2-3, 127-145.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rooijakkers, G. en P.Meurkens, ‘Struggling with the European Atlas’, in: Ethnologia Europaea, 30, 2000, 1, 75-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ryan, M.L., Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence and Narrative Theory. Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Severs, J., ‘David Foster Wallace, James Wood, and a Source for “Irrelevant” Chris Fogle’, in: The Explicator, 73, 2015, 2, 261.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Simon, H.A., ‘Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World’, in: M.Greenberger (red.), Computers, Communications, and the Public Interest. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press, 1971, 37-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Steinz, P., ‘Hoe zjazez obbez Buzjo? De Great Dutch Novel van J.J. Voskuil’, in: NRC Handelsblad, 23januari1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Terranova, T., ‘Attention, Economy and the Brain’, in: Culture Machine, 13, 2012, 1-19.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Veel, K., Narrative Negotiations. Information Structures in Literary Fiction. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Veel, K., ‘Information Overload and Database Aesthetics’, in: Comparative Critical Studies, 8, 2011, 2-3, 307-319.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Ven, I. van de, Big Books in Times of Big Data. Leiden, Leiden University Press, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Vesna, V., ‘Database Aesthetics’, in: AI & Society, 14, 2000, 155-156.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Vesna, V., ‘Seeing the World in a Grain of Sand. The Database Aesthetics of Everything’, in: dez. (red.), Database Aesthetics. Art in the Age of Information Overflow. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2007, 3-38.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Voskuil, J.J., Meneer Beerta. Het Bureau. Amsterdam, Van Oorschot, 1996a.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Voskuil, J.J., Vuile handen. Het Bureau. Amsterdam, Van Oorschot, 1996b.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Voskuil, J.J., Plankton. Het Bureau. Amsterdam, Van Oorschot, 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Voskuil, J.J., Het A.P. Beerta Instituut. Het Bureau. Amsterdam, Van Oorschot, 1998a.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Voskuil, J.J., En ook weemoedigheid. Het Bureau. Amsterdam, Van Oorschot, 1998b.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Voskuil, J.J., Afgang. Het Bureau. Amsterdam, Van Oorschot, 2000a.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Voskuil, J.J., De dood van Maarten Koning. Het Bureau. Amsterdam, Van Oorschot, 2000b.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Wallace, D.F., The Pale King. London, Hamish Hamilton, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Wu, T., The Attention Merchants. New York, Knopf, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/NEDLET2023.2.003.VEN
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error