Een goddelijke braakbal. Maxim Februari’s Klont en de esthetiek van dataficering

References

1. Anderson, C., ‘The End of Theory. The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete’, in: Wired, 23juni2008.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Apprich, C., W.Chung, F.Cramer en H.Steyerl, Pattern Discrimination. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2018.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bauman, Z., Liquid Modernity. Polity, Cambridge, 2000.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bering-Porter, D., ‘Data as Symbolic Form. Datafication and the Imaginary Media of W.E.B. Du Bois’, in: Critical Inquiry, 48, 2022, 2, 262-285.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berry, D., ‘The Postdigital Constellation’, in: D.Berry en M.Dieter (red.), Postdigital Aesthetics. Art, Computation and Design. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, 44-57.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Besser, S., ‘Binding Brain, Body and World. Pattern as a Figure of Knowledge in Andy Clark’s Work on Predictive Processing’, in: Poroi, 17, 2021, 1, 1-27.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bod, R., ‘How to Open Pandora’s Box. A Tractable Notion of the History of Knowledge’, in: Journal for the History of Knowledge, 1, 1, 2020, 1-7.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bod, R., Een wereld vol patronen. De geschiedenis van kennis. Amsterdam, Prometheus, 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bohlmeijer, L., ‘In gesprek met Maxim Februari’, in: De Correspondent, 28oktober2017, https://www.mixcloud.com/decorrespondent/lex-bohlmeijer-in-gesprek-met-maxim-februari/, laatst geraadpleegd 15oktober2023.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Boomen, M. van den, Transcoding the Digital. How Metaphors Matter in New Media. Amsterdam, Institute of Network Cultures, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bois, Y.-A. en R.Krauss, Formless. A User’s Guide. New York, Zone Books, 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Borelli, A. en A.Grieser, ‘Recent Research on the Aesthetics of Knowledge in Science and Religion’, in: Approaching Religion, 7, 2017, 2, 4-18.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bundschuh-van Duikeren, J., ‘Literatuur en kennis. Verkenning van een onderzoeksveld’, in: Internationale Neerlandistiek, 55, 2017, 2, 83-90.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Clark, A., Surfing Uncertainty. Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cramer, F., ‘What is “Post-Digital”?’, in: APRJA, 3, 2014, 1, 10-24.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dennett, D., ‘Real Patterns’, in: The Journal of Philosophy, 88, 1991, 1, 27-51.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dieter, M.‘Dark Patterns. Interface Design, Augmentation and Crisis’, in: D.Berry en M.Dieter (red.), Postdigital Aesthetics. Art, Computation and Design. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, 163-178.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dikkevan Dale, https://vandale.nl/, laatst geraadpleegd 15oktober2023.
19. Eggers, D., The Circle. London, Penguin Books, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Etymologisch Woordenboek van het Nederlands, https://etymologie.nl/, laatst geraadpleegd 15oktober2023.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Februari, M., Klont. Amsterdam, Prometheus, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Foucault, M., De woorden en de dingen. Amsterdam, Boom, 2006 [1966].
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fraknoi, A. e.a., ‘Doomsday 2012 and Cosmophobia. Challenges and Opportunities for Science Communication’, in: Communicating Science, 473, 2013, 3-17.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Galloway, A., Uncomputable. Play and Politics in the Long Digital Age. London & New York, Verso, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Grieser, A., ‘Blue Brains. Aesthetic Ideologies and the Formation of Knowledge Between Religion and Science’, in: A.Grieser en J.Johnston (red.), Aesthetics of Religion. A Connective Concept. Berlin, De Gruyter, 2017, 237-270.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Halpern, O., Beautiful Data. A History of Vision and Reason since 1945. Durham & Londen, Duke University Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Harari, Y.N., Homo Deus. A Brief History of Tomorrow. London, Vintage, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hayles, N.K., How We Became Posthuman. Virtual Bodies in Literature, Cybernetics, and Informatics. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ieven, B. en E.Op de Beek, ‘Searching for New Weapons? Dutch Studies under Late Modern Conditions’, in: Journal of Dutch Literature, 10, 2019, 1, 71-94.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ikeda, R., Continuum. Paris, Xavier Barral Editions, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Johnson, M., ‘The Aesthetics of Embodied Life’, in: A.Scarinzi (red.), Aesthetics and the Embodied Mind. Beyond Art Theory and the Cartesian Mind-Body Dichotomy. Dordrecht, Springer, 2015, 23-38.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lakatos, M., ‘Sights and Sounds of Big Data. Ryoji Ikeda’s Immersive Installations’, in: Acta Univ. Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies, 18, 2020, 109-129.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Long, H. en R.J.So, ‘Literary Pattern Recognition. Modernism between Close Reading and Machine Learning’, in: Critical Inquiry, 42, 2016, 2, 235-267.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Manovich, L., The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Manovich, L., ‘Can We Think Without Categories?’, in: Digital Culture and Society, 4, 2018, 1, 17-28.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Mau, S., The Metric Society. On the Quantification of the Social. Cambridge, Polity, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Mayer-Schönberger, V. en K.Cukier, Big Data. A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Boston & New York, Houghton, Mifflin Harcout, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Menninghaus, W., Disgust. Theory and History of a Strong Sensation. New York, State University Press New York, 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Moretti, F., ‘Pattern and Interpretation’, Stanford LibLit Pamphlet, 15, 2017, https://moodle2.units.it/pluginfile.php/334185/mod_resource/content/2/Moretti_LiteraryLabPamphlet15.pdf, laatst geraadpleegd 15oktober2023.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Morton, T., Hyperobjects. Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis, Minnesota University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Nassehi, A., Muster. Theorie der digitalen Gesellschaft. München, C.H. Beck, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Ngai, S., ‘Network Aesthetics. Juliana Spahr’s The Transformations and Bruno Latour’s Reassembling the Social’, in: C.Weinstein en C.Looby (red.), American Literature’s Aesthetic Dimensions. New York, Columbia University Press, 2012, 367-392.
    [Google Scholar]
43. O’Gorman, M., Necromedia. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Parisi, L., Contagious Architecture. Computation, Aesthetics, and Space. Cambridge MA, MIT Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Parisi, L., ‘The Alien Subject of AI’, in: Subjectivity, 12, 2019, 27-48.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Puschmann, C. en J.Burgess, ‘Metaphors of Big Data’, in: International Journal of Communication, 8, 2014, 1690-1709.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Rasch, M., Frictie. Ethiek in tijden van dataïsme. Amsterdam, De Bezige Bij, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Roepstorff, A., J.Niewöhner en S.Beck, ‘Enculturing Brains through Patterned Practices’, in: Neural Networks, 23, 2010, 8-9, 1051–1059.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Rosenberg, D., ‘Data before the Fact,’ in: LisaGitelman (red.), ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge MA, MIT Press, 15-40.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Saifer, A. en M.T.Dacin, ‘Data and Organization Studies. Aesthetics, Emotions, Discourse and Our Everyday Encounters with Data’, in: Organization Studies, 43, 2021, 4, 623-636.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Stark, L. en A.L.Hoffmann, ‘Data is the New What? Popular Metaphors & Professional Ethics in Emerging Data Culture’, in: Journal of Cultural Analytics, 2mei2019.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Thacker, E., In the Dust of This Planet. Horror of Philosophy, Vol. 1. Portland, Zero Books, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Underwood, T., Distant Horizons. Digital Evidence and Literary Change. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Valenti, C., Das Amorphe im Medialen. Zur politischen Fernsehästhetik im italienischen Sendeformat ‘Blob’. Bielefeld, Transcript, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Velzen, J. van, ‘Interview: Maxim Februari’, in: Trouw, 11oktober2017.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Vervaeck, B., ‘Een nieuwe Bint?’, in: De Reactor, 31oktober2017.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Zuboff, S., The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York, Public Affairs, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]