oa Hoe menselijk is wenselijk?

References

1. Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 468-479.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andreu, L., Casado-Díaz, A. B., & Mattila, A. S. (2015). Effects of message appeal and service type in CSR communication strategies. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1488-1495.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Araujo, T. (2018). Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 183-189.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bainbridge, W. A., Hart, J., Kim, E. S., & Scassellati, B. (2008). The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. RO-MAN 2008 – The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, September, 701-706.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baker, M. A., & Kim, K. (2018). The role of language, appearance, and smile on perceptions of authenticity versus rapport. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 74, 171-179.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2007). Is the uncanny valley an uncanny cliff?RO-MAN 2007 – The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, September, 368-373.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Beatson, A., Lee, N., & Coote, L. V. (2007). Self-Service technology and the service encounter. Service Industries Journal, 27(1), 75-89.
   [Google Scholar]
8. BelancheD., Casaló, L.V., and Flavián, F. (2020) Customer’s acceptance of humanoid robots in services: the moderating role of risk aversion, In A.Rocha et al. (Eds.), Marketing and Smart Technologies (pp. 449-458). Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Schepers, J., & Flavián, C. (2021). Examining the effects of robots’ physical appearance, warmth, and competence in frontline services: The Humanness-Value-Loyalty model. Psychology & Marketing, 38(12), 2357-2376.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Berger, C. R. (1986). Uncertain outcome values in predicted relationships uncertainty reduction theory then and now. Human Communication Research, 13(1), 34-38.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Berger, C. R., & Callabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99-112.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bergmann, K., Eyssel, F., & Kopp, S. (2012). A second chance to make a first impression? How appearance and nonverbal behavior affect perceived warmth and competence of virtual agents over time. In Y.Nakano, M.Neff, A.Paiva, & M.Walker (Eds.), Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 7502, pp. 126-138). Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Blut, M., Wang, C., Wünderlich, N. V., & Brock, C. (2021). Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: a meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49, 632-658.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Successful qualitative research, 1-400.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Broadbent, E., Kumar, V., Li, X., Sollers, J., Stafford, R. Q., MacDonald, B. A., & Wegner, D. M. (2013). Robots with display screens: A robot with a more humanlike face display
    [Google Scholar]
16. Čaić, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Mahr, D. (2018). Service robots: value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks. Journal of Service Management, 29(2), 178-205.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cassell, J. (2000). More than just another pretty face: Embodied conversational interface agents. Communications of the ACM, 43, 70–78.
    [Google Scholar]
18. CBS. (2022). Ondernemers zien werkdruk toenemen als gevolg personeelstekort. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2022/33/ondernemers-zien-werkdruk-toenemen-als-gevolg-personeelstekort
    [Google Scholar]
19. Chattaraman, V., Kwon, W. S., Gilbert, J. E., & Ross, K. (2019). Should AI-Based, conversational digital assistants employ social- or task-oriented interaction style? A task-competency and reciprocity perspective for older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 315-330.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Chaves, A. P., & Gerosa, M. A. (2019). How should my chatbot interact? A survey on human-chatbot interaction design, 1-44. http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.02743
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cowell, A. J., & Stanney, K. M. (2005). Manipulation of non-verbal interaction style and demographic embodiment to increase anthropomorphic computer character credibility. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(2), 281-306.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Crolic, C., Thomaz, F., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2022). Blame the bot: Anthropomorphism and anger in customer–chatbot interactions. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 132-148.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1994). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling performance-based and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 125-131. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252256
    [Google Scholar]
24. Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 68-81.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Curran, J. M., & Meuter, M. L. (2005). Self-service technology adoption: Comparing three technologies. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(2), 103-113.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dale, R. (2016). The return of the chatbots. Natural Language Engineering, 22(5), 811-817.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Derrick, D. C., & Ligon, G. S. (2014). The affective outcomes of using influence tactics in embodied conversational agents. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 39-48.
    [Google Scholar]
28. DiSalvo, C., & Gemperle, F. (2003). From seduction to fulfillment: the use of | anthropomorphic form in design. Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, 67–72.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Dube-Rioux, L., Schmitt, B. H., & Leclerc, F. (1989). Consumers’ reactions to waiting: when delays affect the perception of service quality. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 59-63.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Duffy, B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4), 177-190.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 638-645.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Everett, J., Pizarro, D., & Crockett, M. (2017). Why are we reluctant to trust robots?https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2017/apr/24/why-are-we-reluctant-to-trust-robots
    [Google Scholar]
34. Fink, J. (2012). Anthropomorphism and human likeness in the design of robots and human-robot interaction. In S. S.Ge, O.Khatib, J. J.Cabibihan, R.Simmons, & M. A.Williams (Eds.), Social Robotics. ICSR 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 7621, pp. 199-208). Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77-83.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gartner. (2021). 4 Key Tech Trends in Customer Service to Watch. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/4-key-tech-trends-in-customer-service-to-watch.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Gratch, J., Wang, N., Okhmatovskaia, A., Lamothe, F., Morales, M., van der Werf, R. J., & Morency, L.-P. (2007). Can virtual humans be more engaging than real ones? In Human-Computer Interaction. HCI Intelligent Multimodal Interaction Environments. HCI 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.4552 (pp. 286-297). Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Gremler, D. D., & Gwinner, K. P. (2008). Rapport-building behaviors used by retail employees. Journal of Retailing, 84(3), 308-324.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hale, J., & Hamilton, A. F. de C. (2016). Testing the relationship between mimicry, trust and rapport in virtual reality conversations. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 35295.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., De Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517-527.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Hennig-Thurau, T. (2004). Customer orientation of service employees: Its impact on customer satisfaction, commitment, and retention. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15(5), 460-478.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., & Gremler, D. D. (2002). Understanding relationship marketing outcomes: An integration of relational benefits and relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 4(3), 230-247.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Holtgraves, T. M., Ross, S. J., Weywadt, C. R., & Han, T. L. (2007). Perceiving artificial social agents. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2163-2174.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155-172.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Indebuurt. (2022). No TitleWil je zien: in deze Amsterdamse bar word je bediend door robots!https://indebuurt.nl/amsterdam/nieuws/nieuw-in/robo-bar~257841/
    [Google Scholar]
46. Ivaldi, S., Lefort, S., Peters, J., Chetouani, M., Provasi, J., & Zibetti, E. (2017). Towards Engagement Models that Consider Individual Factors in HRI: On the Relation of Extroversion and Negative Attitude Towards Robots to Gaze and Speech During a Human–Robot Assembly Task: Experiments with the iCub humanoid. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9(1), 63–86.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Kanda, T., Kamasima, M., Imai, M., Ono, T., Sakamoto, D., Ishiguro, H., & Anzai, Y. (2007). A humanoid robot that pretends to listen to route guidance from a human. Autonomous Robots, 22(1), 87–100.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Kaptein, M., Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B., & Aarts, E. (2011). Two acts of social intelligence: The effects of mimicry and social praise on the evaluation of an artificial agent. AI and Society, 26(3), 261-273.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Keeling, K., McGoldrick, P., & Beatty, S. (2010). Avatars as salespeople: Communication style, trust, and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 63(8), 793-800.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Kim, J. H. (2011). Application of the concept of multi-phase experience to wait management in restaurant services. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 16(4), 379-394.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Kim, C., Lee, S. G., & Kang, M. (2012). I became an attractive person in the virtual world: Users’ identification with virtual communities and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1663-1669.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Kim, S. Y., Schmitt, B. H., & Thalmann, N. M. (2019). Eliza in the uncanny valley: anthropomorphizing consumer robots increases their perceived warmth but decreases liking. Marketing Letters, 30(1), 1-12.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Komatsu, T., & Kamide, M. (2017). Designing robot faces suited to specific tasks that these robots are good at. RO-MAN 2017 – 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 1-5.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Krämer, N., Kopp, S., Becker-Asano, C., & Sommer, N. (2013). Smile and the world will smile with you – The effects of a virtual agent’s smile on users’ evaluation and behavior. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 71(3), 335-349.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Laranjo, L., Dunn, A. G., Tong, H. L., Kocaballi, A. B., Chen, J., Bashir, R., Surian, D., Gallego, B., Magrabi, F., Lau, A. Y. S., & Coiera, E. (2018). Conversational agents in healthcare: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(9), 1248-1258.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Larivière, B., Bowen, D., Andreassen, T. W., Kunz, W., Sirianni, N. J., Voss, C., Wünderlich, N. V., & De Keyser, A. (2017). “Service Encounter 2.0”: An investigation into the roles of technology, employees and customers. Journal of Business Research, 79, 238-246.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Lavender, S. A., Sommerich, C. M., Sanders, E. B. N., Evans, K. D., Li, J., Radin Umar, R. Z., & Patterson, E. S. (2020). Developing Evidence-Based Design Guidelines for Medical/Surgical Hospital Patient Rooms That Meet the Needs of Staff, Patients, and Visitors. Health Environments Research and Design Journal, 13(1), 145-178.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Lecy, J. D., & Beatty, K. E. (2012). Representative literature reviews using constrained snowball sampling and citation network analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal, January.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Lee, K. M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., & Kim, S. R. (2006). Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human–robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(10), 962-973.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Liao, C., Lin, H. N., Luo, M. M., & Chea, S. (2017). Factors influencing online shoppers’ repurchase intentions: The roles of satisfaction and regret. Information and Management, 54(5), 651-668.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Liebrecht, C., & van der Weegen, E. (2019). Menselijke chatbots: Een zegen voor online klantcontact? het effect van conversational human voice door chatbots op social presence en merkattitude. Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschap, 47(3), 217-238.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Liu, X., Yi, X., & Wan, L. C. (2022). Friendly or competent? The effects of perception of robot appearance and service context on usage intention. Annals of Tourism Research, 92, 103324.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Lombard, M., & Xu, K. (2021). Social responses to media technologies in the 21st century: The media are social actors paradigm. Human-Machine Communication, 2, 29-55.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Luo, J. T., McGoldrick, P., Beatty, S., & Keeling, K. A. (2006). On-screen characters: Their design and influence on consumer trust. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(2), 112-124.
    [Google Scholar]
65. McBreen, H. M., & Jack, M. A. (2001). Evaluating humanoid synthetic agents in e-retail applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, 31(5), 394-405.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Morgan, B. (2017). 10 Things robots can’t do better than humans. https://www.forbes.com/sites/blakemorgan/2017/08/16/10-things-robots-cant-do-betterthan-humans/#547f6ffcc83d
    [Google Scholar]
67. Nass, C., & Reeves, B. (1996). The Media Equation: How people treat computers, television and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Nass, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E. R. (1994). Computers are social actors. Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI ’94, 72-78.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Nickson, D., Warhurst, C., & Dutton, E. (2005). The importance of attitude and appearance in the service encounter in retail and hospitality. Managing Service Quality, 15(2), 195-208.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Noone, B. M., Kimes, S. E., Mattila, A. S., & Wirtz, J. (2009). Perceived service encounter pace and customer satisfaction. Journal of Service Management, 20(4), 380-403.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (2019). Relationship journeys in the internet of things: a new framework for understanding interactions between consumers and smart objects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(2), 216-237.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Nowak, K. L., & Rauh, C. (2005). The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1), 153-178.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Oertel, C., Castellano, G., Chetouani, M., Nasir, J., Obaid, M., Pelachaud, C., & Peters, C. (2020). Engagement in Human-Agent Interaction: An Overview. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Packard, G., Moore, S. G., & McFerran, B. (2014). How Can “I” Help “You”? The impact of personal pronoun use in customer-firm agent interactions. In Marketing Science Institute Research Report. http://www.msi.org/reports/how-can-i-help-you-the-impact-of-personal-pronoun-use-in-customer-firm-agen/
    [Google Scholar]
75. Paiva, A., Dias, J., Sobral, D., Aylett, R., Woods, S., Hall, L., & Zoll, C. (2005). Learning by feeling: Evoking empathy with synthetic characters. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(3-4), 235-266.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 136-153. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.136
    [Google Scholar]
77. Polani. (2017). Motionless chatbots are taking over customer service – and it’s bad news for consumers. https://theconversation.com/emotionless-chatbots-are-taking-over-customer-service-and-its-bad-news-for-consumers-82962
    [Google Scholar]
78. Powers, A., Kramer, A. D. I., Lim, S., Kuo, J., Sau-laiLee, & Kiesler, S. (2005). Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot. ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005, 158-163.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2010). A study of demographic embodiments of product recommendation agents in electronic commerce. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(10), 669-688.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Qiu, H., Li, M., Shu, B., & Bai, B. (2019). Enhancing hospitality experience with service robots: the mediating role of rapport building. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 29(3), 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2019.1645073
    [Google Scholar]
81. Radziwill, N. M., & Benton, M. C. (2017). Evaluating quality of chatbots and intelligent conversational agents. In arXiv: preprint. http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04579
    [Google Scholar]
82. Rust, R. T., & Huang, M.-H. (2014). The service revolution and the transformation of marketing science. Marketing Science, 33(2), 206-221.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Salem, M., Eyssel, F., Rohlfing, K., Kopp, S., & Joublin, F. (2013). To err is human(-like): effects of robot gesture on perceived anthropomorphism and likability. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(3), 313-323.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Sanders, E. B.-N. (2000). Generative tools for co-designing. In Collaborative Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0779-8_1
    [Google Scholar]
85. Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2012). Convivial toolbox: Generative design research for the front end of design (BIS).
    [Google Scholar]
86. Schuetzler, R. M., Grimes, G. M., & Giboney, J. S. (2018). An investigation of conversational agent relevance, presence, and engagement. Americas Conference on Information Systems 2018: Digital Disruption, AMCIS 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Seo, S. H., Griffin, K., Young, J. E., Bunt, A., Prentice, S., & Loureiro-Rodríguez, V. (2018). Investigating People’s Rapport Building and Hindering Behaviors When Working with a Collaborative Robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(1), 147–161.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Specht, N., Fichtel, S., & Meyer, A. (2007). Perception and attribution of employees’ effort and abilities: The impact on customer encounter satisfaction. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18(5), 534-554.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Sundaram, D. S., & Webster, C. (2000). The role of nonverbal communication in service encounters. Journal of Services Marketing, 14(5), 378-391.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Van Dolen, W. M., Dabholkar, P. A., & de Ruyter, K. (2007). Satisfaction with online commercial group chat: The influence of perceived technology attributes, chat group characteristics, and advisor communication style. Journal of Retailing, 83(3), 339-358.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Van Doorn, J., Mende, M., Noble, S. M., Hulland, J., Ostrom, A. L., Grewal, D., & Petersen, J. A. (2017). Domo arigato Mr. Roboto: Emergence of automated social presence in organizational frontlines and customers’ service experiences. Journal of Service Research, 20(1), 43-58.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Van Pinxteren, M. M. E., Pluymaekers, M., & Lemmink, J. G. A. M. (2020). Humanlike communication in conversational agents: a literature review and research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 31(2), 203-225.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Van Pinxteren, M. M. E., Wetzels, R. W. H., Rüger, J., Pluymaekers, M., & Wetzels, M. (2019). Trust in humanoid robots: implications for services marketing. Journal of Services Marketing, 33(4), 507-518.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Von Der Pütten, A. M., Krämer, N. C., Gratch, J., & Kang, S. H. (2010). “It doesn’t matter what you are!” Explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1641-1650.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., & Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 219-232.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Wirtz, J., Patterson, P. G., Kunz, W. H., Gruber, T., Lu, V. N., Paluch, S., & Martins, A. (2018). Brave new world: service robots in the frontline. Journal of Service Management, 29(5), 907-931.
    [Google Scholar]
97. Wirtz, J., Kunz, W., & Paluch, S. (2021). The service revolution, intelligent automation and service robots. European Business Review, 29(5), 38-44.
    [Google Scholar]
98. Yoo, W., Kim, S. Y., Hong, Y., Chih, M. Y., Shah, D. V., & Gustafson, D. H. (2015). Patient-clinician mobile communication: Analyzing text messaging between adolescents with asthma and nurse case managers. Telemedicine and E-Health, 21(1), 62-69.
    [Google Scholar]