2004
Volume 114 Number 1
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2022.1.004.DOOR
2022-04-01
2024-11-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/00025275/114/1/ANTW2022.1.004.DOOR.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2022.1.004.DOOR&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Altay, S, & Mercier, H. (2020). Rationalizations Primarily Serve Reputation Management, Not Decision Making,Behavioral and Brain Sciences43, pp. e29. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X19002115.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bar-Hillel, M., & Budescu, D. (1995) The Elusive Wishful Thinking Effect,Thinking and Reasoning1(1), pp. 71-103. DOI:10.1080/13546789508256906
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baron, J. (2017) Utilitarian vs. Deontological Reasoning: Method, Results, and Theory, in: J.-F.Bonnefon, B.Trémolière (eds.), Moral Inferences, Hove: Psychology Press, pp. 137-151.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boissin, E., Caparos, S., Raoelison, M., & De Neys, W. (2021) From Bias to Sound Intuiting: Boosting Correct Intuitive Reasoning,Cognition online prepub. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104645
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Claidière, N., Trouche, E., & Mercier, H. (2017) Argumentation and the Diffusion of Counter-intuitive Beliefs. Journal of Experimental Psychology146(7), pp. 1052–1066. DOI:10.1037/xge0000323.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. De Neys, W. (2020) Morality, Normativity, and the Good System 2 Fallacy,Diametros17(64), pp. 90-95DOI:10.33392/diam.1447.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Haidt, J. (2001) The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail,Psychological Review108(4), pp. 814-34. DOI:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hahn, U, & Harris, A. J. L. (2014). What Does It Mean to Be Biased,Psychology of Learning and Motivation 61, pp. 41–102. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-800283-4.00002-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Harris, A. J. L., Corner, A., & Hahn, U. (2009) Estimating the Probability of Negative Events,Cognition110(1), pp. 51-64. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.006.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoover, J. D., & Healy, A. F. (2017) Algebraic Reasoning and Bat-and-Ball Problem Variants: Solving Isomorphic Algebra First Facilitates Problem Solving Later,Psychonomic Bulletin & Review24(6), pp. 1922-28. DOI:10.3758/s13423-017-1241-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. Allen Lane.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kunda, Z. (1990) The Case for Motivated Reasoning,Psychological Bulletin108(3), pp. 480-98
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lovejoy, A. (1961) Reflections on Human Nature. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Morewedge, C. K., Yoon, H., Scopelliti, I., Symborski, C. W., Korris, J. H., & Kassam, K. S. (2015) Debiasing Decisions: Improved Decision Making with A Single Training Intervention,Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences2(1), pp. 129-140. DOI:10.1177/2372732215600886.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Parfit, D. (2011) On What Matters, Volume2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Pinker, S. (2011) The Better Angels of Our Nature: The Decline of Violence in History and Its Causes, London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Purcell, Z. A., Wastell, C. A., & Sweller, N. (2020) Domain-Specific Experience And Dual-Process Thinking,Thinking & Reasoning, pp. 1–29. DOI:10.1080/13546783.2020.1793813
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sperber, D. & Baumard, N. (2012) Moral Reputation: An Evolutionary and Cognitive Perspective,Mind & Language27(5), pp. 495-518. DOI:10.1111/mila.12000
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Street, S. (2006) A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value,Philosophical Studies127(1), pp. 109-66. DOI:10.1007/s11098-005-1726-6
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2022.1.004.DOOR
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error