2004
Volume 78, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2542-6583
  • E-ISSN: 2590-3268

Samenvatting

Abstract

As part of NTT JTSR’s series on Key Texts, this article discusses Gerardus Van der Leeuw’s 1937 monograph . In this book, Van der Leeuw discusses primitive mentality, which he derives from Lucien Lévy-Bruhl. According to Van der Leeuw, primitive mentality is of great importance to human life and, in particular, to religion. The concept largely disappeared from anthropological discourse after World War II and was criticized for several reasons. Although that criticism is justified, and the term primitive mentality should be avoided, Lévy-Bruhl and Van der Leeuw use it to refer to a participatory attitude that can be distinguished from a scientific way of reasoning. Based on their work, four forms of thinking that belong to a participatory attitude can be identified. The distinctive character and value of a participatory attitude are illustrated by examples from Christology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2024.1.002.BENJ
2024-03-01
2024-12-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Athanasius. De incarnatione verbi. Lyon: Sources Chrétiennes 199, 1973.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Benjamins, Rick. Een en ander: De traditie van de moderne theologie. Kampen: Kok, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biro, Sasha L.“Levinas’s Reception of the Mythic.”The Journal of Speculative Philosophy31, no. 3 (2017): 422-431.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cazeneuve, Jean. Lucien Lévy-Bruhl. Translated by PeterRivière. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dawes, Gregory W.“Participation and Causality: Lévy-Bruhl Revisited.”Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses43, no. 2 (2014): 294–318.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Deprez, Stanislas. “Actualités de Lévy-Bruhl.”Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger200 no. 2 (2010): 235-248.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gess, Nicola. Primitive Thinking: Figuring Alterity in German Modernity. Translated by ErikButler and Susan L.Salomon. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hofstee, Willem. Goden en mensen: De godsdienstwetenschap van Gerardus van der Leeuw. Kampen: Kok Agora, 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jahoda, Gustav. “Piaget and Lévy-Bruhl.”History of Psychology3, no. 3 (2000): 218-238.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Keck, Frédéric. Lévy-Bruhl, Entre philosophie et anthropologie: Contradiction et participation. Paris: CNRS éditions, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Koning, Elisabeth, and Takken, Wilfred. Zwart op wit: Twee eeuwen blackface in Nederland. Amsterdam: Athenaeum, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Leeuw van der, G.Historisch christendom. Utrecht: A. Oosthoek, 1919.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Leeuw van der, G.De primitieve mensch en de religie: anthropologische studie. Groningen: Wolters, 1937.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Leeuw van der, G.Der Mensch und die Religion: anthropologischer Versuch. Basel: Haus zum Falken, 1941.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Leeuw van der, G.Inleiding tot de phaenomenologie van den godsdienst. Haarlem: De erven F. Bohn n.v., 1948.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Leeuw van der, G.Wegen en Grenzen, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: H.J. Paris, 1948.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Leeuw van der, G.Inleiding tot de theologie, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: H.J. Paris, 1948.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Levinas, Emmanuel. “Lévy-Bruhl and Contemporary Philosophy.” In Entre Nous. Translated by Michael B.Smith and BarbaraHarshav, 39-51. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Levinas, Emmanuel. Existence and Existents. Translated by AlphonsoLingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Savage Mind. Translated by GeorgeWeidenfeld and Nicolson Ltd. Letchworth: The Garden City Press, 1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lévy-Bruhl, Lucien. How Natives Think. Translated by Lilian A.Clare, introduced by C. ScottLittleton. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Luther, Martin. D. Martin Luthers Werke: kritische Gesamtausgabe. Weimar: Herrmann Böhlau, 1883.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Merllié, Dominique, “Durkheim, Lévy-Bruhl et la ‘pensée primitive’: quel différend?”L’Année sociologique62, no. 2 (2012): 429-446.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Molendijk, Arie L.“Tua res agitur: Gerardus van der Leeuws visie op fenomenologie en antropologie.”Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift63, no. 4 (2009): 273-288.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Molendijk, Arie L.“Au fond: The Phenomenology of Gerardus van der Leeuw.”Journal for the History of Modern Theology25, no.1-2 (2018): 51-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sanders, E.P.Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Segal, Robert A.“Jung and Lévy-Bruhl.”Journal of Analytical Psychology52, no. 5 (2007): 635–658.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sierksma, Fokke. “Met en tegen Lévi-Strauss.”Tirade7, mei (1963): 306-330.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Der christliche Glaube 1830/31. Herausgegeben von RolfSchäfer. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Strijdom, Johan. “Gerardus van der Leeuw at the Voortrekker Monument: A Postcolonial Critique of his Concept of Sacred Place.”Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift72, no. 3 (2018): 243-251.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Veer van der, René. “Primitive Mentality Reconsidered.”Culture and Psychology9, no. 2 (2003): 179-184.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wolff, Ernst. Political Responsibility for a Globalised World: After Levinas’ Humanism. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Woodburn, James, ThomasWidlok, Edwin N.Wilmsen and TimIngold. “Primitive Mentality.”The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute7, no. 4 (2001): 767-770.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2024.1.002.BENJ
Loading
Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error