oa (Social) Media: Binding or Blinding?

References

1. Ahler, D. J. (2014). Self-fulfilling misperceptions of public polarization. The Journal of Politics, 76(3), 607-620.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2020). The welfare effects of social media. American Economic Review, 110(3), 629-676.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Asimovic, N., Nagler, J., Bonneau, R., & Tucker, J. A. (2021). Testing the effects of Facebook usage in an ethnically polarized setting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(25), e2022819118.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Boulianne, S., Lalancette, M., & Ilkiw, D. (2020). “School Strike 4 Climate”: Social Media and the International Youth Protest on Climate Change. Media and Communication, 8(2), 208-218.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brants, K. (Ed.) (2012). Journalistiek en politiek in onzekere tijden. Amsterdam: Boom.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Conover, M. D., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2012). Partisan asymmetries in online political activity. EPJ Data science, 1(1), 1-19.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Damstra, A., & Vliegenthart, R. (2019). Hard to get and hard to neglect. Geert Wilders en de Nederlandse pers. In: Wilders gewogen. 15 jaar reuring in de Nederlandse politiek, edited by K.Vossen & G.Voermans (pp. 289-308). Amsterdam: Boom.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019). The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 111-119.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dekker, P. (Ed.). (2022). Politieke polarisatie in Nederland. Het Wereldvenster.
    [Google Scholar]
11. De Bruin, K., Vliegenthart, R., Kruikemeier, S., & De Haan, Y. (2023). Who are they? Different profiles of news avoiders based on motivations, lifestyle and personality traits. Manuscript under review.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eady, G., Paskhalis, T., Zilinsky, J., Bonneau, R., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2023). Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behaviour. Nature communications, 14, 62.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Frimer, J. A., Aujla, H., Feinberg, M., Skitka, L. J., Aquino, K., Eichstaedt, J. C., & Willer, R. (2023). Incivility is rising among American politicians on Twitter. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(2), 259-269.
    [Google Scholar]
14. González-Bailón, S., & Lelkes, Y. (2023). Do social media undermine social cohesion? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 17(1), 155-180.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gottfried, J., Mitchell, A., Jurkowitz, M., & Liedke, J. (2022). Journalists sense turmoil in their industry amid continued passion for their work. Pew Research Center, 14.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hameleers, M., & Van der Meer, T. G. (2020). Misinformation and polarization in a high-choice media environment: How effective are political fact-checkers?. Communication Research, 47(2), 227-250.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Harteveld, E. (2021). Fragmented foes: Affective polarization in the multiparty context of the Netherlands. Electoral Studies, 71, 102332.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kubin, E., & Von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188-206.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Levendusky, M., & Malhotra, N. (2016). Does media coverage of partisan polarization affect political attitudes?. Political Communication, 33(2), 283-301.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2023). A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(1), 74-101.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Marlow, T., Miller, S., & Roberts, J. T. (2020). Twitter discourses on climate change: exploring topics and the presence of bots.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Marozzo, F., & Bessi, A. (2018). Analyzing polarization of social media users and news sites during political campaigns. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 8, 1-13.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303-330.
    [Google Scholar]
24. O’Grady, C. (2022). In the line of fire. Science, 24.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau (2022). Burgerperspectieven 2022 deel 2. Den Haag: SCP.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Suhay, E., Bello-Pardo, E., & Maurer, B. (2018). The polarizing effects of online partisan criticism: Evidence from two experiments. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 95-115.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z., & Popa, S. A. (2020). The dynamics of political incivility on twitter. Sage Open, 10(2)
    [Google Scholar]
29. Van der Goot, E., Kruikemeier, S., Vliegenthart, R., & De Ridder, J. (2024). The Online Battlefield: How Conflict Frames in Political Advertisements Affect Political Participation in a Multiparty Context. Political Studies, OnlineFirst, https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231178105
    [Google Scholar]
30. Terren, L., & Borge-Bravo, R. (2021). Echo chambers on social media: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Communication Research, 9, 99-118.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Törnberg, P., Andersson, C., Lindgren, K., & Banisch, S. (2021). Modeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society. PLoS One, 16(10), e0258259.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Tsfati, Y., Meyers, O., & Peri, Y. (2006). What is good journalism? Comparing Israeli public and journalists’ perspectives. Journalism, 7(2), 152-173.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Vermeer, S., Trilling, D., Kruikemeier, S., & De Vreese, C. (2020). Online news user journeys: the role of social media, news websites, and topics. Digital Journalism, 8(9), 1114-1141.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Vliegenthart, R., Van Ham, C.T., Kruikemeier, S., & Jacobs, K.T.E. (2024). A Matter of Misunderstanding? Explaining (Mis)Perceptions of Electoral Integrity Across 25 Different Nations. Accepted for publication in Public Opinion Quarterly.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Vliegenthart, R., Stromback, J., Boomgaarden, H., Broda, E., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Tsfati, Y., Van Remoortere, A. (2023). Taking Political Alternative Media into Account: Investigating the Linkage Between Media Repertories and (Mis) perceptions. Mass Communication and Society. OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2023.2251444
    [Google Scholar]
36. Voorn, C. (2017, 2april). “Het is cruciaal dat kinderen met nieuws leren omgaan”. NOS. https://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/artikel/2166244-het-is-cruciaal-dat-kinderen-met-nieuws-leren-omgaan
    [Google Scholar]
37. Yarchi, M., Baden, C., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). Political polarization on the digital sphere: A cross-platform, over-time analysis of interactional, positional, and affective polarization on social media. Political Communication, 38(1-2), 98-139.
    [Google Scholar]