2004
Volume 40, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0169-2216
  • E-ISSN: 2468-9424

Samenvatting

Samenvatting

De gangbare opvatting lijkt te zijn dat het fysieke, psychologische en professionele welzijn van de werkende populatie een gedeelde verantwoordelijkheid is tussen werknemer en werkgever. Tegelijkertijd is een trend richting responsabilisering van werknemers waar te nemen, waarbij uitgegaan wordt van het individu (i-frame) in plaats van dat organisatieproblemen als systemisch (s-frame) worden bestempeld. Dit artikel past het i-frame en s-frame toe om naar verantwoordelijkheden in de arbeidsrelatie te kijken. Doel is om voor verschillende dimensies van goed werk een overzicht te geven van concepten in de literatuur die raken aan de verantwoordelijkheden van werknemers (i-concepten) en die van werkgevers (s-concepten). Op deze manier wordt invulling gegeven aan de beginselen ‘goed werknemerschap’ en ‘goed werkgeverschap’ en worden handvatten geboden voor het uitwerken van het idee van gedeelde verantwoordelijkheid in de arbeidsrelatie. Dit artikel sluit af met een pleidooi voor een evenwichtige aanpak van goed werk, oftewel werkomgevingen die veilig, gezond en motiverend zijn.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2024.4.003.PLUU
2024-12-01
2024-12-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akkermans, J., & Kubasch, S. (2017). #Trending topics in careers: A review and future research agenda. Career Development International, 22(6), 586-627.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alias, N. E., Othman, R., Hamid, L. A., Salwey, N. S., Romaiha, N. R., Samad, K. A., & Masdek, N. R. N. M. (2018). Managing job design: The roles of job rotation, job enlargement and job enrichment on job satisfaction. Journal of Economic & Management Perspectives, 12(1), 397-401.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414-435.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson, S. E., Coffey, B. S., & Byerly, R. T. (2002). Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: Links to work-family conflict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management, 28(6), 787-810.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job demands-resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 25-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakker, A. B., & Van Woerkom, M. (2018). Strengths use in organizations: A positive approach of occupational health. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 59(1), 38-46.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bal, P. M., & Dóci, E. (2018). Neoliberal ideology in work and organizational psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(5), 536-548.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bal, P. M., Matthews, L., Dóci, E., & McCarthy, L. P. (2021). An ideological analysis of sustainable careers: Identifying the role of fantasy and a way forward. Career Development International, 26(1), 83-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Breevaart, K., Wisse, B. M., & Schyns, B. (2022). Trapped at work: The barriers model of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Perspectives, 36(3), 936-954.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26-48.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chater, N., & Loewenstein, G. (2023). The i-frame and the s-frame: How focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e147.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747-770.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clarke, S. (2006). The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 315-327.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Curcuruto, M., Conchie, S. M., & Griffin, M. A. (2019). Safety citizenship behavior (SCB) in the workplace: A stable construct? Analysis of psychometric invariance across four European countries. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 129, 190-201.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dachner, A. M., Ellingson, J. E., Noe, R. A., & Saxton, B. M. (2021). The future of employee development. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2), 100732.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. De Angelis, M., Giusino, D., Nielsen, K., Aboagye, E., Christensen, M., Innstrand, S. T., Mazzetti, G., van den Heuvel, M., Sijbom, R. B. L., Pelzer, V., Chiesa, R., & Pietrantoni, L. (2020). H-work project: Multilevel interventions to promote mental health in SMEs and public workplaces. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 1-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. De Vos, A., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Akkermans, J. (2020). Sustainable careers: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117, 103196.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. DeJoy, D. M., & Wilson, M. G. (2003). Organizational health promotion: Broadening the horizon of workplace health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 17(5), 337-334.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dobbins, T., Cao, X., Green, A., Johnstone, P., & Foster, W. (2024). Conceptualizing decent work: An explorative study of decent work in England’s Midlands region. Policy Studies, 1-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dollard, M. F., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 579-599.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Drobnič, S., Beham, B., & Präg, P. (2010). Good job, good life? Working conditions and quality of life in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 99, 205-225.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Duffy, R. D., Allan, B. A., England, J. W., Blustein, D. L., Autin, K. L., Douglass, R. P., Ferreira, J., & Santos, E. J. (2017). The development and initial validation of the Decent Work Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(2), 206-221.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Edwards, P., & Wright, M. (2001). High-involvement work systems and performance outcomes: the strength of variable, contingent and context-bound relationships. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(4), 568-585.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Geller, E. S. (2005). Behavior-based safety and occupational risk management. Behavior Modification, 29(3), 539-561.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gibb, S., & Ishaq, M. (2020). Decent work: What matters most and who can make a difference? Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(4), 845-861.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gochman, D. S. (1997). Handbook of health behavior research. Plenum.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 317-375.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Green, F. (2021). Decent work and the quality of work and employment. Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Online, Springer Nature, 1-39.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Griffin, M. A., & Curcuruto, M. (2016). Safety climate in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 191-212.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Grawitch, M. J., Gottschalk, M., & Munz, D. C. (2006). The path to a healthy workplace: A critical review linking healthy workplace practices, employee well-being, and organizational improvements. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 58(3), 129-147.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Han, S. J., & Stieha, V. (2020). Growth mindset for human resource development: A scoping review of the literature with recommended interventions. Human Resource Development Review, 19(3), 309-331.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ilies, R., Lanaj, K., Pluut, H., & Goh, Z. (2018). Intrapersonal and interpersonal need fulfillment at work: Differential antecedents and incremental validity in explaining job satisfaction and citizenship behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 108, 151-164.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Johnson, V. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2014). Making use of professional development: Employee interests and motivational goal orientations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(2), 99-108.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kalliath, T., & Brough, P. (2008). Work-life balance: A review of the meaning of the balance construct. Journal of Management & Organization, 14(3), 323-327.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kossek, E. E., & Lautsch, B. A. (2008). CEO of me: Creating a life that works in the flexible job age. Wharton School Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kossek, E. E., & Michel, J. S. (2011). Flexible work schedules. In S.Zedeck (Red.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 1. Building and developing the organization (pp. 535-572). American Psychological Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work–family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 289-313.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Landsbergis, P. A. (2003). The changing organization of work and the safety and health of working people: A commentary. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45(1), 61-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Maravelias, C., & Holmqvist, M. (2016). ‘Healthy organisations’: Developing the self-managing employee. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 16(1-2), 82-99.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Maurer, T. J., Weiss, E. M., & Barbeite, F. G. (2003). A model of involvement in workrelated learning and development activity: The effects of individual, situational, motivational, and age variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 707-724.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Mowbray, P. K., Wilkinson, A., & Tse, H. H. (2015). An integrative review of employee voice: Identifying a common conceptualization and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(3), 382-400.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Munck, B. (2001). Changing a culture of face time. Harvard Business Review, 79(10), 125-131.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Noort, M. C., Reader, T. W., & Gillespie, A. (2019). Speaking up to prevent harm: A systematic review of the safety voice literature. Safety Science, 117, 375-387.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Op den Kamp, E. M., Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2018). Proactive vitality management in the work context: Development and validation of a new instrument. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(4), 493-505.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and contextual performance. Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Pluut, H., Ilies, R., Curşeu, P. L., & Liu, Y. (2018). Social support at work and at home: Dual-buffering effects in the work-family conflict process. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 146, 1-13.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Pluut, H., & Wonders, J. (2020). Not able to lead a healthy life when you need it the most: Dual role of lifestyle behaviors in the association of blurred work-life boundaries with well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 607294.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Runhaar, P., Sanders, K., & Yang, H. (2010). Stimulating teachers’ reflection and feedback asking: An interplay of self-efficacy, learning goal orientation, and transformational leadership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1154-1161.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Scharp, Y. S., Bakker, A. B., Breevaart, K., Kruup, K., & Uusberg, A. (2023). Playful work design: Conceptualization, measurement, and validity. Human Relations, 76(4), 509-550.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Shain, M., & Kramer, D. M. (2004). Health promotion in the workplace: Framing the concept; reviewing the evidence. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61(7), 643-648.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2015). Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S72-S103.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Sonnentag, S., & Pundt, A. (2016). Organisational health behavior climate: Organisations can encourage healthy eating and physical exercise. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 65(2), 259-286.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2018). How role jugglers maintain relationships at home and at work: A gender comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(12), 1265-1282.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 173-186.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Van der Put, A. C. (2023). Healthy at work: The role of the work environment in worksite health promotion [Proefschrift]. Universiteit Utrecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Weaver, B., Kirk-Brown, A., Goodwin, D., & Oxley, J. (2023). Psychosocial safety behavior: A scoping review of behavior-based approaches to workplace psychosocial safety. Journal of Safety Research, 84, 33-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid. (2020). Het betere werk. De nieuwe maatschappelijke opdracht (WRR-rapport 102). WRR.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Zatzick, C. D., & Iverson, R. D. (2011). Putting employee involvement in context: A cross-level model examining job satisfaction and absenteeism in highinvolvement work systems. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(17), 3462-3476.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2024.4.003.PLUU
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2024.4.003.PLUU
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error