2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Lampas
  4. Volume 56, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 56, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0165-8204
  • E-ISSN: 2667-1573

Abstract

Abstract

The or , unearthed at Lyon in 1528, preserves part of a speech delivered to the senate in AD 48 by Claudius. The emperor pleads to admit the elites of Gallia Comata to the Roman senate. This article presents a rhetorical analysis of the speech. Modern readers have labeled the style of the speech ‘bombastic’ and ‘pedantic’, while criticizing its many historical examples. An examination of the speech in terms of and , however, demonstrates that Claudius carefully constructs the of a knowledgeable and open-minded authority. It is argued that two moments of rhetorical persuasion could be distinguished: the senate meeting in Rome and the publication of the bronze inscription at the sanctuary of the Three Gauls at Lugdunum. Not much deliberative rhetoric was perhaps needed to persuade the senators to agree with their emperor; the display of the inscription, on the other hand, could be interpreted as a form of epideictic rhetoric, which may have given a significant boost to the confidence of Roman citizens in Gaul. While some senators in Rome may have disliked the lengthy historical as part of the oral speech, visitors of the sanctuary in Lugdunum may have appreciated seeing Gaul included in the long history of Rome.

© Casper de Jonge
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2023.4.006.JONG
2023-12-01
2024-11-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albrecht, M. von. 1971. Meister römischer Prosa. Von Cato bis Apuleius, Heidelberg.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Fabia, P.1929. La Table Claudienne de Lyon, Lyon.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Gerbrandy, P.2001. Quintilianus, De opleiding tot redenaar, Groningen.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Hardy, E.G.1912. ‘The Speech of Claudius on the Adlection of Gallic Senators’, The Journal of Philology63, 79-95.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Hengst, D. den. 1996. Suetonius, Keizers van Rome, Amsterdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Huys, M.2004. Aristoteles, Retorica. Vertaald, ingeleid en van aantekeningen voorzien, Groningen.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Huzar, E.1984. ‘Claudius – the Erudite Emperor’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.32.1, Berlijn/New York, 611-650.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Jakobsmeier, H.2018. Die Gallier-Rede des Claudius aus dem Jahr 48 n. Chr. Historischphilologische Untersuchungen und Kommentar zur Tabula Claudiana aus Lyon (diss. Universität Münster), München.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Kennedy, G.1972. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World. 300 B.C.-A.D. 300, Princeton.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Klein, J.1996. ‘Exemplum’, in G.Ueding (ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik. Band 3, Tübingen, 60-70.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Malloch, S.J.V.2020. The Tabula Lugdunensis. A critical edition with translation and commentary, Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Op de Coul, M.2000. Longinus. Het sublieme, Groningen.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Riess, W.2003. ‘Die Rede des Claudius über das ius honorum der gallischen Notablen. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven’, Revue des Études Anciennes105.1, 211-249.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Schulz, V.2018. ‘Exempla und species. Zur Rhetorik und Funktion von Beispielen in Suetons Flavierviten’, in T.Blank en F.Maier (eds), Die symphonischen Schwestern. Narrative Konstruktion von ‚Wahrheiten‘ in der nachklassischen Geschichtsschreibung, Stuttgart, 305-326.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Sluiter, I.2017. ‘Anchoring Innovation. A classical research agenda’, European Review25.1, 20-38.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Syme, R.1958. Tacitus, Oxford.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Syme, R.1999. The Provincial at Rome, and Rome and the Balkans 80 BC – AD 14. Edited by A.R.Birley, Exeter.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Wellesley, K.1954. ‘Can You Trust Tacitus?’, Greece & Rome1.1, 13-33.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2023.4.006.JONG
Loading
Keyword(s): Claudius; exempla; Lyon tablet; rhetoric; style

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error