Een discourse-pragmatische analyse van de Tabula Lugdunensis, van een correspondent lange zinnen | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 56, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0165-8204
  • E-ISSN: 2667-1573

Abstract

Abstract

This article takes a discourse pragmatic approach to the Latin text of the . The speech by the emperor Claudius from 48 CE is known for its syntactical complexities. By explaining Claudius’s Latin, I aim to illustrate that a discourse pragmatic approach is more fruitful than a strictly syntactical analysis. First, I discuss the outline of the speech, addressing the way in which both the organisation at the text level and Claudius’s may have helped his live public in processing the speech. Then, I use the concept of to approach Claudius’s and segmentation of his speech at the sentence level. I make a distinction between , , and to analyse the nature of the sequences in Claudius’ brief biographies of Numa, Tarquinius Priscus and Servius Tullius.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2023.4.007.ADEM
2023-12-01
2024-07-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allan, R.J.2009. ‘Orale elementen in de Homerische grammatica. Intonatie-eenheid en enjambement’, Lampas42, 136-151.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chafe, W.1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing, Chicago/Londen.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fabia, P.1929. La table Claudienne de Lyon, Lyon.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hannay, M. en C.H.M.Kroon. 2005. ‘Acts and the Relation between Grammar and Discourse’, Functions of Language12.1, 87-124.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jakobsmeier, H.2019. Die Gallier-Rede des Claudius aus dem Jahr 48 n. Chr., München.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kroon, C.H.M.2005. ‘The Relationship between Grammar and Discourse. Evidence from the Latin particle quidem’, in G.Calboli (ed.), Latina Lingua! Papers on Grammar IX 2,Rome, 577-590.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kroon, C.H.M.2009. ‘Latin Linguistics between Grammar and Discourse. Units of analysis, levels of analysis’, in E.Rieken en P.Widmer (eds), Pragmatische Kategorien: Form, Funktion und Diachronie, Wiesbaden, 143-158.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kroon, C.H.M.2011. ‘Latin Particles and the Grammar of Discourse’, in J.Clackson (ed.), A Companion to the Latin Language, Malden/Oxford, 176-195.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Malloch, S.J.V.2020. The Tabula Lugdunensis. A critical edition with translation and commentary, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mayer, R.G.2005. ‘The Impracticability of Latin “Kunstprosa”’, in T.Reinhardt, M.Lapidge en J.N.Adams (eds), Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose, Oxford, 195-210.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Nipperdey, K.L.1852. Cornelius Tacitus. 2: Ab excessu divi Augusti XI-XVI, Berlijn.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Pinkster, H.2015. The Oxford Latin Syntax. Volume 1: The simple clause, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rooij n-Dijkman, H.W.A. van. 1996. Livius, Hannibal voor de poorten. De geschiedenis van Rome XXI-XXX[Ab urbe condita libri], Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sage, P.1980. ‘La table Claudienne et le style de l’empereur Claude: essai de réhabilitation’, Revue des Études Latines58, 274-312.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2023.4.007.ADEM
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2023.4.007.ADEM
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error