Van Aeneas naar Augustus, via Ascanius?

References

1. Adema, S.A.2022. ‘Unhappy Dido, queen of Carthage’, in M.P.de Bakker, B.van den Berg en J.Klooster (eds), Emotions and narrative in ancient literature and beyond. Studies in honour of Irene de Jong, Boston, 554-568.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Boyle, A.J.1986. The Chaonian dove. Studies in the Eclogues, Georgics, and Aeneid of Virgil, Leiden.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Budelmann, F., L.Maguire en B.Teasdale. 2016. ‘Ambiguity and audience response’, Arion23.3, 89-114.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cairns, F.1989. Virgil’s Augustan epic, Cambridge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Casali, S.2004. ‘Nisus and Euryalus. Exploiting the contradictions in Virgil’s “Doloneia”’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology102, 319-354.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clausen, W.1964. ‘An interpretation of the Aeneid’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology68, 139-147.
   [Google Scholar]
7. College voor Toetsen en Examens. 2023. Latijnse Taal en Cultuur vwo. Syllabus Centraal Examen 2025, Utrecht.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Conte, G.B.2007. ‘The strategy of contradiction. On the dramatic form of the Aeneid’, in S.J.Harrison (ed.), Thepoetry of pathos. Studies in Virgilian epic, Oxford, 150-168.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fratantuono, L.M. en R.A.Smith. 2022. Virgil, Aeneid 4. Text, translation, commentary, Leiden.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Galinsky, G.K.1996. Augustan culture. An interpretive introduction, Princeton.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hardie, P.1994. Aeneid. Book IX, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Horsfall, N.2013. ‘Aeneid’ 6. A commentary, Berlijn/Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Klingner, F.1967. Virgil.Bucolica, Georgica, Aeneis, Zürich.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lyne, R.O.A.M.1987. Further voices in Vergil’sAeneid, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Makowski, J.F.1989. ‘Nisus and Euryalus. A Platonic relationship’, The Classical Journal85.1, 1-15.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Mynors, R.A.B.1969. P. Vergili Maronis opera, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
17. O’Hara, J.J.1990. Death and the optimistic prophecy in Vergil’sAeneid, Princeton.
    [Google Scholar]
18. O’Hara, J.J.2007. Inconsistency in Roman epic. Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Parry, A.1963. ‘The two voices of Virgil’s Aeneid’, Arion2.4, 66-80.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Pease, A.S.1935. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber quartus, Cambridge, Mass.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Perkell, C.1994. ‘Ambiguity and irony: the last resort?’, Helios21.1, 63-74.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Petrini, M.1997. The child and the hero. Coming of age in Catullus and Vergil, Ann Arbor.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Pöschl, V.1977. Die Dichtkunst Virgils. Bild und Symbol in derÄneis, Berlijn.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Putnam, M.C.J.1965. The poetry of the Aeneid. Four studies in imaginative unity and design, Cambridge, Mass.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Rimmon-Kenan, S.1977. The concept of ambiguity. The example of James, Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Rogerson, A.2017. Virgil’s Ascanius. Imagining the future in theAeneid, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Schoonhoven, H.2003. Publius Vergilius Maro,Aeneis, Bussum.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Stanford, W.B.1972. Ambiguity in Greek literature. Studies in theory and practice, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Tarrant, R.2012. Virgil. Aeneid book XII, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Thilo, G. en H.Hagen. 1878. Servii grammatici qvi fervntvr in Vergilii Aeneidos libros I-III commentarii, Leipzig.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Thomas, R.F.2001. Virgil and the Augustan reception, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Tuggy, D.1993. ‘Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness’, Cognitive Linguistics4.3, 273-290.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Velden, B. van der.2017. Ancient approaches of ambiguity in literature (diss. Cambridge), Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Vöhler, M.2021. ‘Modern and ancient concepts of ambiguity’, in M.Vöhler, T.Fuhrer en S.Frangoulidis (eds), Strategies of ambiguity in ancient literature, Berlijn/Boston, 1-10.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Vöhler, M., T.Fuhrer en S.Frangoulidis (eds). 2021. Strategies of ambiguity in ancient literature, Berlijn/Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Wiesen, D.S.1973. ‘The pessimism of the eighth Aeneid’, Latomus32.4, 737-765.
    [Google Scholar]