oa Poëzie en politiek in de 4^e eeuw n.Chr.

References

1. Bleckmann, B.2020. ‘From Caesar to Augustus. Julian against Constantius’, in S.Rebenich en H.-U.Wiemer (eds), A Companion to Julian the Apostate, Leiden/Boston, 97-123.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Burgersdijk, D.2016. De macht van de traditie. Over het keizerschap van Augustus en Constantijn, Amsterdam.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Burgersdijk, D.2018. ‘Constantine’s Son Crispus and His Image in Contemporary Panegyrical Accounts’, in D.Burgersdijk en A.Ross (eds), Imagining Emperors in the Later Roman Empire, Leiden/Boston, 137-157.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Burgersdijk, D.2021. ‘Constantine’s Arch. A reassessment in the light of textual and material evidence’, in M.P.Garcia Ruiz en A.J.Quiroga (eds), Emperor and Emperorship in Late Antiquity, Leiden, 53-75.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cameron, A.1970. Claudian. Poetry and propaganda at the court of Honorius, Oxford.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Charlet, J.-L.2018. Claudien. Oeuvres. Tome IV, Petits Poèmes, Parijs.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Consolino, F.E.1986. Elogio di Serena, Venetië.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Coombe, C.2018. Claudian the Poet, Cambridge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Diamantopolou, L.2016. Griechische visuelle Poesie. Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, Frankfurt am Main.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Drijvers, J.W.1992. ‘Flavia Maxima Fausta. Some remarks’, Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte41, 500-506.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Green, R.P.H.1991. The Works of Ausonius, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hekster, O.2015. Emperors and Ancestors. Roman rulers and the constraints of tradition, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hemelrijk, E.1999. Matrona Docta. Educated women in the Roman elite from Cornelia to Julia Domna, Londen.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Heus, W.E.1982. Claudius Claudianus. Laus Serenae (carm.min. 30). Inleiding en commentaar (dissertatie), Utrecht.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kennedy, G.A.2003. Progymnasmata. Greek textbooks of prose composition and rhetoric, Leiden/Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kulikowski, M.2016. The Triumph of Empire. The Roman world from Hadrian to Constantine, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kulikowski, M.2019. The Tragedy of Empire. From Constantine to the destruction of Roman Italy, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Luz, C.2010. Technopaignia. Formspiele in der griechischen Dichtung, Leiden/Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
19. McGill, S. en J.Pucci (eds) 2016. Classics Renewed. Reception and innovation in the Latin poetry of Late Antiquity, Heidelberg.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Omissi, A.2018. Emperors and Usurpers in the Later Roman Empire. Civil war, panegyric, and the construction of legitimacy, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Pelttari, A.2014. The Space that Remains. Reading Latin poetry in Late Antiquity, Ithaca, NY.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Polara, I. (ed.) 1973. Publilii Optatiani Porfyrii, carmina I & II, Turijn.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Race, W.H.2019. Menander Rhetor. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Ars Rhetorica. Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Rees, R.2012. ‘The Modern History of Latin Panegyric’, in R.Rees (ed.), Latin Panegyric, Oxford, 3-41.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ricci, M.L.2001. Claudii Claudiani Carmina Minora (Quaderni di “Invigilata Lucernis” 12), Bari.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Roberts, M.2010. The Jeweled Style. Poetry and poetics in Late Antiquity, Ithaca, NY.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Squire, M.2017. ‘POP-art. The optical poetics of Publilius Optatianus Porfyrius’, in J.Elsner en J.Hernández Lobato (eds), The Poetics of Late Latin Literature, Oxford, 25-99.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Squire, M. en J.Wienand (eds) 2017. Morphogrammata. The lettered art of Optatian. Figuring cultural transformations in the age of Constantine, Paderborn.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Szelest, H.1977. ‘Klaudians Laus Serenae’, Eos: Commentarii Societatis Philologae Polonorum65, 257-263.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Varner, E.R.2004. Mutilation and transformation. Damnatio memoriae and Roman imperial portraiture, Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ware, C.2012. Claudian and the Roman Epic Tradition, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Washington, B.2020. ‘Conventions in Julian’s Encomium to Eusebia. Does gender make a difference?’, in A.Omissi en A.Ross (eds), Imperial Panegyric from Diocletian to Honorius (Translated Texts for Historians, Contexts 3), Liverpool, 93-116.
    [Google Scholar]