oa Weerstand in de praktijk

References

1. Arkowitz, H. (2002). Toward an integrative perspective on resistance to change. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(2), 219-227.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press
   [Google Scholar]
3. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W., & D’Amelio, A. (2008). Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 362-377.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Fransen, M. L. (2022). Resistance. In E. Y.Ho, C. L.Bylund, & J. C. M.Van Weert (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of health communication (pp. 1-6). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119678816.iehc0664
   [Google Scholar]
6. Fransen, M. L., Smit, E. G., & Verlegh, P. W. (2015). Strategies and motives for resistance to persuasion: An integrative framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1201.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Fransen, M. L., Verlegh, P. W., Kirmani, A., & Smit, E. G. (2015). A typology of consumer strategies for resisting advertising, and a review of mechanisms for countering them. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 6-16
   [Google Scholar]
8. Knowles, E. S., & Linn, J. A. (2004). Approach-avoidance model of persuasion: Alpha and Omega strategies for change. In E. S.Knowles & J. A.Linn (Red.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 117-148). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Knowles, E. S., & Riner, D. D. (2007). Omega approaches to persuasion: Overcoming resistance. In A. R.Pratkanis (Red.), The science of social influence: Advances and future progress (pp. 83-114). Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Newman, C. F. (2002). A cognitive perspective on resistance in psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(2), 165-174.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Nordgren, L., & Schonthal, D. (2021). The human element: Overcoming the resistance that awaits new ideas. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
12. O’Keefe, D. J., & Hoeken, H. (2021). Message design choices don’t make much difference to persuasiveness and can’t be counted on – Not even when moderating conditions are specified. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2004). Resistance to persuasion: An attitude strength perspective. In J. T.Jost, M. R.Banaji & D. A.Prentice (Red.), Perspectivism in social psychology: The yin and yang of scientific progress (pp. 3751). American Psychological Association.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ringold, D. J. (2002). Boomerang effects in response to public health interventions: Some unintended consequences in the alcoholic beverage market. Journal of Consumer Policy, 25(1), 27-63.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Sheeran, P., & Webb, T. L. (2016). The intention–behavior gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(9), 503-518.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Van ’t Riet, J., & Ruiter, R. A. (2013). Defensive reactions to health-promoting information: An overview and implications for future research. Health Psychology Review, 7(sup1), S104-S136.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Van Putten, M., Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, E., & Tykocinski, O. E. (2013). Inaction inertia. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 123-159.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Zhao, X., & Fink, E. L. (2021). Proattitudinal versus counterattitudinal messages: Message discrepancy, reactance, and the boomerang effect. Communication Monographs, 88(3), 286-305.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Zuwerink Jacks, J., & Cameron, K. A. (2003). Strategies for resisting persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(2), 145-161.
    [Google Scholar]