Ovid’s Cephalus and the dangers of mistranslation

References

1. Ahl, F.1985. Metaformations. Soundplay and wordplay in Ovid and other classical poets, Ithaca.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Curran, L.1978. ‘Rape and Rape Victims in the Metamorphoses’, Arethusa11, 213-241.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Davidson, J.1997. ‘Antoninus Liberalis and the Story of Prokris’, Mnemosyne50, 165-184.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Davis, G.1983. The Death of Procris. Amor and the hunt in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Rome.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Freas, D.2018. ‘Da femina ne sim. Gender, genre, and violence in Ovid’s Caenis episode’, Classical Journal114, 60-84.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gibson, R.K.2003. Ovid, Ars Amatoria Book 3, Cambridge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. GreenP.1979. ‘The Innocence of Procris. Ovid A.A. 3.687-746’, Classical Journal75, 15-24.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fontenrose, J.1980. ‘Ovid’s Procris’, Classical Journal75, 289-294.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Heath, J.1991. ‘Diana’s Understanding of Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, Classical Journal86, 233-243.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hejduk, J.D.2011. ‘Death by Elegy. Ovid’s Cephalus and Procris’, Transactions of the American Philological Association141, 285-314.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hinds, S.2002. ‘Landscape with figures. Aesthetics of place in the Metamorphoses and its tradition’, in P.Hardie (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ovid, Cambridge, 122-149.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Jones, P.2007. Reading Ovid. Stories from the Metamorphoses, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Labate, M.1975. ‘Amore coniugale e amore “elegiaco” nell’episodio di Cefalo e Procri (Ov., Met., 7, 661-865)’, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa5, 103-128.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Louden, B.1999. The Odyssey. Structure, narration, and meaning, Baltimore.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Maltby, R.1991. A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies, Leeds.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Mayor, J.M.B.2017. Power Play in Latin Love Elegy and its Multiple Forms of Continuity in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Murray, A.T.1919. Homer. Odyssey, Volume I: Books 1-12 (revised by G.E.Dimock), Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
18. McCarter, S.2018a. ‘Is Homer’s Calypso a Feminist Icon or a Rapist?’, Electric Literature, electricliterature.com/is-homers-calypso-a-feminist-icon-or-a-rapist (accessed 9September2022).
    [Google Scholar]
19. McCarter, S2018b. ‘Rape, Lost in Translation. How translators of Ovid’s Metamorphoses turn an assault into a consensual encounter’, Electric Literature, electricliterature.com/rape-lost-in-translation (accessed 9June2022).
    [Google Scholar]
20. McCarter, S.2022a. ‘Ovid’s Callisto and Feminist Translation of the Metamorphoses’, EuGeStA12, 1-32.
    [Google Scholar]
21. McCarter, S.2022b. Ovid, Metamorphoses, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Nguyen, N.L.2006. ‘Roman Rape. An overview of Roman rape laws from the Republican period to Justinian’s reign’, Michigan Journal of Gender and the Law13, 75-112.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Packman, Z.M.1993. ‘Call it Rape. A motif in Roman Comedy and its suppression in English-speaking publications’, Helios20, 42-55.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Papaioannou, S.2017. ‘Epic Middles and Epic Awareness in the Narrative of Cephalus and Procris in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, Paideia: rivista di filologia, ermeneutica e critica letteraria72, 239-260.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Pechillo, M.1990. ‘Ovid’s Framing Technique. The Aeacus and Cephalus epyllion (Met. 7.490-8.5)’, Classical Journal86, 35-44.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Peek, P.2004. ‘Cephalus’ Incredible Narration. Metamorphoses 7.661-865’, Latomus63, 605-614.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pöschl, V.1959. ‘Kephalos und Prokris in Ovids Metamorphosen’, Hermes87, 328-343.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Rimell, V.2006. Ovid’s Lovers. Desire, difference and the poetic imagination, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Romeo, A.2020. ‘Cephalus’s Autobiographical Narrative (Metamorphoses 7.690-865). Between epic models and the conventions of rhetoric’, Arethusa53, 157-174.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Rufo, K.M.2016. ‘Circe’s Understanding of Rape Victims in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, XIV’, New England Classical Journal43, 203-240.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sabot, A.1985. ‘Heur et malheur d’un amour conjugal: Céphale et Procris (Ovide, Métamorphoses, VII, 661-862)’, in J.M.Frégaut and D.Porte (eds), Journées ovidiennes de Parmenie, 199-214.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Saylor, C.2008. ‘The Gifts of Procris’, Mnemosyne61, 651-658.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Segal, C.1978. ‘Ovid’s Cephalus and Procris. Myth and Tragedy’, Grazer Beiträge7, 175-205.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Tarrant, R.J.1995. ‘The Silence of Cephalus. Text and narrative technique in Ovid, Metamorphoses 7.685ff.’, Transactions of the American Philological Association125, 99-111.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Tarrant, R.J., 2004. P. Ovidi Nasonis Metamorphoses, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Tarrant, R.J.2005. ‘Roads Not Taken. Untold stories in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici54, 65-89.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Tissol, G.1997. The Face of Nature. Wit, narrative, and cosmic origins in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Princeton.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Wilson, E.R.2018. Homer. The Odyssey, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wohl, V.J.1993. ‘Standing by the Stathmos. The creation of sexual ideology in the Odyssey’, Arethusa26, 19-50.
    [Google Scholar]