oa Kun je de HR-professional in gesprek brengen met de organisatieontwerper?

References

1. Bakker, A. & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job Demands–Resources Theory: taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baritz, L. (1960). The servants of power: A history of the use of social science in American industry. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/11283-010
   [Google Scholar]
3. Breque, M., De Nul, L., Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0: towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. Policy Brief DG for Research and Innovation. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/308407
   [Google Scholar]
4. Christis, J. (1995). Taakbelasting en taakverdeling in het basisonderwijs. Heerlen: Stichting Vervangingsfonds.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Christis. J., Huizing, M., Moesker, H., Kersjes, R., Nijenkamp, N., & Soepenberg, E. (2019). Werkdrukinstrument voor de zorg. Groningen: Hanzehogeschool / Marian van Os Centre of Expertise.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Christis, J., Kersjes, R., & Soepenberg, E. (2016). Triple Aim. Goede zorg en werkbaar werk. Groningen: Hanzehogeschool
   [Google Scholar]
7. Christis, J., & Soepenberg, E. (2016). Lowlands Socio-technical Design Theory and Lean Production. In: Mohr, Bernard, J., Amelsvoort, Pierre, van (Eds.), Co-creating humane and innovative organizations. Evolutions in the Practice of Socio-Technical System Design (pp. 303-325). Portland: Global STS-D Network Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. De Sitter, L. U. (1981). Op weg naar nieuwe fabrieken en kantoren. Deventer: Kluwer.
   [Google Scholar]
9. De Sitter, L.U. (1993). A socio-technical perspective. In: F.M.van Eijnatten (Ed.), The Paradigm that Changed the Work Place. Volume 4. Social Science for Social Action: Toward Organizational Renewal (pp. 158-184). Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum (the Swedish Centre for Working Life) and Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum, 1993.
   [Google Scholar]
10. De Sitter, L. U. (1994, 2e herziene druk 1998). Synergetisch produceren. Human Resources Mobilisation in de productie: een inleiding in de structuurbouw. Assen: Van Gorcum.
    [Google Scholar]
11. De Sitter, L. U., Den Hertog, J. F., & Dankbaar, B. (1997). From complex organisations with simple jobs to simple organisations with complex jobs. Human Relations, 50(5), 497–534.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dhondt, S. & Vaas, F. (2001). WEBA analysis. Manual. Leiden: TNO Work and Employment.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fleming, W. J. (2023). Employee well-being outcomes from individual-level mental health interventions: Cross-sectional evidence from the United Kingdom. Industrial Relations Journal, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12418
    [Google Scholar]
14. Govers, M., & Van Amelsvoort, P. (2019). A Sociotechnical Perspective on the Digital Era: The Lowlands view. European Journal of Workplace Innovation, 4(2): Special issue: Sociotechnical systems thinking in manufacturing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46364/ejwi.v4i2.589
    [Google Scholar]
15. Govers, M. & Van Amelsvoort, P. (2023). A theoretical essay on socio-technical systems design thinking in the era of digital transformation. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO). DOI:10.1007/s11612-023-00675-8
    [Google Scholar]
16. Guest, D., Knox, A., & Warhurst, C. (2022). Humanizing work in the digital age: Lessons from socio-technical systems and quality of working life initiatives. Human Relations, 75(8), 1461-1482. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221092674
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hacker, W. (1986). Complete vs. incomplete working tasks: A concept and its verification. In G.Debus, & H.-W.Schroiff (eds.), The psychology of work organization (pp. 23 – 36). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publisers / North Holland Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hacker, W. (2003). Action regulation theory: a practical tool for the design of modern work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12(2), 105–130. DOI:10.1080/13594320344000075
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hulsegge, G., Van der Torre, W., Verbiest, S., & Oeij, P. (2022). De impact van technologie op taken, skills en kwaliteit van de arbeid: Hoe verandert het werk van een elektro- en onderhoudsmonteur?Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 38 (2), 169-191, https://doi.org/10.5117/TVA2022.2.004.HULS
    [Google Scholar]
20. Karanika-Murray, M. & Oeij, P.R.A. (2017). The role of work and organizational psychology for workplace innovation practice: From short-sightedness to eagle view. EWOP in Practice, Special Issue on Workplace Innovation, (1), 19-30.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Karasek, R A & Theorell, T G. T. (1990). Healthy Work: Stress, Productivity and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kuipers, H., Van Amelsvoort, P., & Kramer, E.-H. (2020). New ways of organizing: Alternatives to bureaucracy. Leuven, Den Haag: Acco.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Oeij, P. & Dhondt, S. (2017), Theoretical approaches supporting workplace innovation. In: P.R.A.Oeij, D.Rus, & F.D.Pot (eds), Workplace innovation: Theory, research and practice (pp. 63–78). Series ‘Aligning Perspectives on Health, Safety and Well-Being’. Cham (Switzerland): Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Oeij, P., Dhondt, S. & Vaas, F. (2024). ‘Connecting the SMART work design approach to sociotechnical design principles’. Paper presentation for “Work Design for Success: Innovative Research and Leading-Edge Practice”; The 2024 Centre for Transformative Work Design Conference, Perth, Western Australia, 13February2024. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshows/connecting-the-smart-work-design-approach-to-sociotechnical-design-principles-peter-oeij-steven-dhondt-fietje-vaas/266036295
    [Google Scholar]
25. Oeij, P.R.A., Hulsegge, G., & Van der Torre, W. (2021). Technology Impact Methode 3.0: Een kwalitatieve aanpak over de impact van technologie op werk. Leiden: TNO.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Oeij, P.R.A., Lenaerts, K., Dhondt, S., Van Dijk, W., Schartinger, D., Sorko, S.R., Warhurst, C. (2024). A Conceptual Framework for Workforce Skills for Industry 5.0: Implications for Research, Policy and Practice. Journal of Innovation Management, 12(1), 205-233.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_012.001_0010
    [Google Scholar]
27. Oeij, P., Pot, F., Van den Bossche, S., Preenen, P., Van der Torre, W. & Vaas, F. (2024). Goed werk: transities naar goede banen leiden. Whitepaper Kwaliteit van Werk. Leiden: TNO Innovation for Life.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Parker, S.K., & Boeing, A.A. (2023). Workplace innovation in the digital era: a role for SMART work design. In: P.R.A.Oeij, S.Dhondt, A.J.McMurray (eds.), A Research Agenda for Workplace Innovation: The Challenge of Disruptive Transitions (pp. 91-112). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Parker, S.K. & Grote, G. (2020). Automation, algorithms, and beyond: why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Applied Psychology: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241
    [Google Scholar]
30. Parker, S. K., & Grote, G. (2022). More than ‘more than ever’: Revisiting a work design and sociotechnical perspective on digital technologies. Applied Psychology, 71(4), 1215–1223. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12425
    [Google Scholar]
31. Parker, S. K., & Knight, C. (2023). The SMART model of work design: A higher order structure to help see the wood from the trees. Human Resource Management, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22200
    [Google Scholar]
32. Parker, S.K., Morgeson, F.P., & Johns, G. (2017). One hundred years of work design research: Looking back and looking forward. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 403.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Peeters, M.H.H. & Mossink, J.C.M. (1995). De WEBA-methode. Deel 2: Herontwerp. Alphen a/d Rijn: Samsom Bedrijfsinformatie.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Pot, F.D. (2017). Workplace innovation and wellbeing at work. In: Oeij, P.R.A., Rus, D., & Pot, F.D. (eds.) Workplace Innovation: Theory, Research and Practice. Series Aligning Perspectives on Health, Safety and Well-being (pp. 95 – 110). Cham (Switzerland): Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Pot, F., Christis, J., Fruytier, B., Kommers, H., Middendorp, J., Peeters, M. & Vaas, S. (1989). Functieverbetering en organisatie van de arbeid. Welzijn bij de arbeid (WEBA) gelet op de stand van de arbeids- en bedrijfskunde. (S71) Den Haag: Directoraat-Generaal van de Arbeid.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pot, F.D., Peeters, M.H.H., Vaas, F. & Dhondt, S. (1994). Assessment of stress risks and learning opportunities in the work organization. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 4(1), 21-37.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Preenen, P. T. Y. (2024). Succesvolle technologie op het werk bestaat niet zonder mensen! Het belang van mensgericht werken voor succesvolle technologie-implementatie. Lectorale rede. Saxion: Deventer.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., Derks, D., & van Rhenen, W. (2013). Job Crafting at the Team and Individual Level: Implications for Work Engagement and Performance. Group & Organization Management, 38(4), 427–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601113492421
    [Google Scholar]
39. Vaas, F. (2023). Kwalitatieve benadering van KCW: functie-analyse. In: P.Oeij (red.), Kortcyclisch werk. Quo vadis? (pp. 38-43; 95-102). TNO en RIVM i.o.v. Instituut GAK. Leiden: TNO Innovation for Life.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Vaas, S., Dhondt, S., Peeters, M. H. H., & Middendorp, J. (1995). De WEBA-methode. Deel 1: WEBA-analyse handleiding. Alphen a/d Rijn: Samsom Bedrijfsinformatie.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Van Amelsvoort, P. & Van Hootegem, G. (2017). Towards a Total Workplace Innovation Concept Based on Sociotechnical Systems Design. In: P.Oeij, D.Rus, and F.D.Pot (eds), Workplace Innovation: Theory, Research and Practice. Series Aligning Perspectives on Health, Safety and Well-being (pp. 281-299). Springer (Schwitzerland): Cham.
    [Google Scholar]