oa Het leven is lang

References

1. Bhayro, S.2018. ‘The Reception of Galen in the Syriac Tradition’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 163-178.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bouras-Vallianatos, P.2018a. ‘Galen in Late Antique Medical Handbooks’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 38-61.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bouras-Vallianatos, P.2018b. ‘Galen in Byzantine Medical Literature’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 86-110.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bouras-Vallianatos, P. en B.Zipser (eds). 2018. Brill’s companion to the Reception of Galen, Leiden en Boston.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bryson, J.2001. The Kitāb al-ḥāwī of Rāzī (ca 900 AD). Book one of the Ḥāwī on brain, nerve, and mental disorders. Studies in the transmission of the medical texts from Greek into Arabic into Latin, Ann Arbor.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bylebyl, J. J.1991. ‘Teaching methodus medendi in the Renaissance’, Studies in Ancient Medicine1, 157-189.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Caballero-Navas, C.2018. ‘The Reception of Galen in Hebrew Medieval Scientific Writings’, P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 537-558.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cooper, A.2007. Inventing the Indiginous. Local knowledge and natural history in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cooper, G. M.2018. ‘Hunayn ibn Ishāq and the Creation of an Arabic Galen’ in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 179-195.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Degni, P.2018. ‘Textual Transmission of Galen in Byzantium’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 124-139.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Delisle, C.2004. ‘The letter: private text or public place? The Mattioli-Gesner controversy about the aconitum primum’,Gesnerus61, 161-176.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Donato, M. P.2018. ‘Galen in an Age of Change (1650-1820)’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 487-507.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fancy, N.2018. ‘Galen and Ibn al-Nafīs’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 263-278.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Forcada, M.2018. ‘The Reception of Galen after Avicenna (Eleventh-Twelfth Centuries)’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 227-243.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fortuna, S.2018. ‘Editions and Translations of Galen from 1490-1540’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 437-452.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Garofalo, I.2018. ‘Galen’s Legacy in Alexandrian Texts Written in Greek, Latin, and Arabic’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 62-85.
    [Google Scholar]
17. García Ballester, L.1998. ‘The New Galen. A challenge to Latin Galenism in thirteenth-century Montpellier’, in K.-D.Fischer, D.Nickel en P.Potter (eds), Text and Tradition. Studies in ancient medicine and its transmission, Leiden, 55-83.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Glick, T. F., S. J. Livesey en F.Wallis (eds). 2005. Medieval Science, Technology, and Medicine. An encyclopedia, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Green, M. H.2018. ‘Gloriosissimus Galienus. Galen and Galenic writings in the eleventh- and twelfth-century Latin West’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 319-342.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Havrda, M.2011. ‘Galenus Christianus? The doctrine of demonstration in Stromata VIII and the question of its source’, Vigiliae Christianae65, 343-375.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Havrda, M.2017. The so-called Eighth Stromateus by Clement of Alexandria. Early Christian reception of Greek scientific methodology, Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Klerk, S.2014. ‘Trouble with Opium. Taste, reason and experience in late Galenic pharmacology with special regard to the University of Leiden (1575-1625)’, Early Science and Medicine19, 287-316.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Klerk, S.2015. Galen Reconsidered. Studying drug properties and the foundations of medicine in the Dutch Republic ca. 1550-1700(dissertatie Universiteit Utrecht), Ridderkerk.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Koetschet, P.2018. ‘From Commentary to Polemic. The reception of Galen by Ab. Bakr al-R.z.’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 196-215.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lawn, B.1993. The Rise and Decline of the Scholastic ‘Quaestio Disputata’. With special emphasis on its use in the teaching of medicine and science, Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Long, B.2018. ‘Arabic-Latin Translations. Transmission and transformation’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 343-358.
    [Google Scholar]
27. McVaugh, M. R.2001. ‘Moments of Inflection. The careers of Arnau de Vilanova’, in P.Biller en J.Ziegler (eds), Religion and Medicine in the Middle Ages, York, 47-67.
    [Google Scholar]
28. McVaugh, M. R.2018. ‘Galen in the Medieval Universities, 1200-1400’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 381-392.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Nance, B.2001. Turquet de Mayerne as Baroque Physician. The art of medical portraiture, Amsterdam en New York NY.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Nutton, V.1989. ‘Pieter van Foreest and the Plagues of Europe. Some observations of the Observationes’ in H. L.Houtzager (ed.), Pieter van Forrest. Een Hollands medicus in de zestiende eeuw, Amsterdam, 25-39.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Nutton, V.1996. ‘“Idle old trots, coblers and costardmongerds”. Pieter van Foreest on quackery’, in H. A.Bosman-Jelgersma (ed.), Petrus Forestus medicus, Amsterdam, 243-256.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Nutton, V.1997, ‘Hellenism postponed. Some aspects of Renaissance medicine, 1490-1530’, Sudhoffs Archiv, Vol. 81, H. 2, 158-170.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Nutton, V.2008. ‘The fortunes of Galen’, in R. J.Hankinson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge, 355-390.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Nutton, V.2018. ‘Renaissance Galenism, 1540-1640. Flexibility or an increasing irrelevance’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 472-486.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Pietrobelli, A.2018. ‘Galen’s Early Reception (second-third centuries)’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos, en B.Zipser (eds), 11-37.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pomata, G.2005. ‘Praxis Historialis: the uses of Historia in early modern medicine’, in G.Pomota and N. G.Siraisi (eds), Historia. Empiricism and erudition in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge MA en Londen, 105-146.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pomata, G.2010. ‘Sharing Cases. TheObservationes in early modern medicine’, Early Science and Medicine15, 193-236.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ragland, E.2012. ‘Chymistry and Taste in the Seventeenth Century. Franciscus Dele Boë Sylvius as a chymical physician between Galenism and Cartesianism’, Ambix, 59, 1-21.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Reeds, K. M.1976. ‘Renaissance humanism and botany’, Annals of Science33, 519-542.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Reeds, K. M.1991. Botany in Medieval and Renaissance Universities, New York NY en Londen.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Savino, C.2018. ‘Galenic’ Forgeries of the Renaissance. An overview on commentaries falsely attributed to Galen’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 453-471.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Stathakopoulos, D.2018. ‘Galen in Non-medical Byzantine Texts, 600-1453’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 140-163.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Strohmaier, G.2018. ‘Avicenna between Galen and Aristotle’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 215-226.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Temkin, O.1973. Galenism. Rise and decline of a medical philosophy, Ithaca.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Urso, A. M.2018. ‘Translating Galen in the Medieval West: the Greek-Latin translations’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 359-380.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Wear, A.1981. ‘Galen in the Renaissance’, in V.Nutton (ed.), Galen. Problems and prospects, London, 229-262.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Yoeli-Tlalim, R.2018. ‘Galen in Asia?’, in P.Bouras-Vallianatos en B.Zipser (eds), 594-608.
    [Google Scholar]