2004
Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0960-2720
  • E-ISSN: 2666-9730

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to derive principles for a theology of miracles from the theology of Martin Chemnitz. Drawing from patristic dyothelite Christology, Chemnitz describes the relationship between Jesus’ two natures as an interaction between divine and human will. This leads to an analogous understanding of the relationship between Jesus’ two natures in the hypostatic union and the relationship between the risen Jesus and believers. Having considered the concept of miracles, the study argues that this analogy can be applied as a fundamental presupposition for a theology of miracles. The article further illustrates that Chemnitz’ thoughts about miracles build upon the Christological and anthropological assumptions of Athanasius, suggesting that Chemnitz’ views contribute foundational elements for a theology of miracles aligned with Nicene Christology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/EJT2025.1.004.TEIG
2025-03-01
2025-04-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Athanasius of Alexandria, ‘Life of Antony’ in PhilipSchaff and HenryWace (eds), Select Worksand Letters. Nicene and Post­Nicene Fathers, series 2 Vol 2 (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1987) 188–221.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayres, Lewis, Nicaea and Its Legacy. An Approach to Fourth­Century Trinitarian Theology (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Basinger, David, ‘What is a miracle?’ in Graham H.Twelftree (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Miracles (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011) 19–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bekenntnisschriften der evangelisch­lutherischen Kirche, Die (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1979).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blackburn, Barry L., ‘The miracles of Jesus’ in Graham H.Twelftree (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Miracles (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011) 113-130.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Book of Concord, The, The Confession of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, ed. Theodore G.Tappert (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1959).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Butner Jr., D. Glenn, The Son Who Learned Obedience. A Theological Case Against the Eternal Submission of the Son (Eugene: Pickwick, 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chemnitz, Martin, The Two Natures in Christ (St. Louis: Concordia, 1971); original Latin De duabus naturis in Christo, de hypostatica earum unione, de communicatione idiomatium (Jena 1570).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chemnitz, Martin, Enchiridion. The Lord’s Supper, and the Lord’s Prayer (St. Louis: Concordia, 2007a; German: Handbuch der vornehmsten Hauptteile der christlichen Lehre. Durch Fragen und Antworten aus Gottes Wort einfach und gründlich erklärt (1593; Neuendettelsau: Freimund, 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chemnitz, Martin, Examination of the Council of Trent Vol 1 (St. Louis: Concordia, 2007b); German: Examen Concilii Tridentini. Deutsch Vol 1 (Neuendettelsau: Freimund, 2022). Latin original in four parts, 1565–1573.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cross, Richard, Communicatio Idiomatum. Reformation Christological Debates (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Drake, K.J., The Flesh of the Word. The extra Calvinisticum from Zwingli to Early Orthodoxy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Eve, Eric, The Healer from Nazareth. Jesus’ Miracles in Historical Context (London: SPCK, 2009 Kindle).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gavrilyuk, Paul L., ‘The Retrieval of Deification. How a once despised archaism became an ecumenical desideratum’, Modern Theology25.4 (2009) 647-659.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gavrilyuk, Paul L., ‘How Deification was Rediscovered in Modern Orthodox Theology. The contribution of Ivan Popov’, Modern Theology38.1 (2022) 100–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gerhard, Johann, Theological Commonplaces. On the Person and Office of Christ (St. Louis: Concordia, 2009).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodich, Michael, Miracles and Wonders. The Development of the Concept of Miracle, 1150 – 1350 (New York: Routledge, 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Grabowski, Stanislaus J., The Church. An Introduction to the Theology of St. Augustine (St. Louis: Herder, 1957).
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Haga, Joar, Was there a Lutheran Metaphysics? The interpretation of communicatio idiomatum in Early Modern Lutheranism (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2012).
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Henriksen, Jan-Olav, ‘Jesus as Healer and Contemporary Theology’ in Jan-OlavHenriksen and Karl OlavSandnes, Jesus as Healer. A Gospel for the Body (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2016) 133–253.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hodge, Charles, Systematic Theology Vol 2 (New York: Charles Scribner, 1872; repr. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1940).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Holmes, S.R., ‘Asymmetrical assumption. Why Lutheran Christology does not lead to kenoticism or divine passibility’, Scottish Journal of Theology72.4 (2019) 357-374.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hägglund, Bengt, ‘”Majestas hominis Christi”. Wie hat Martin Chemnitz die Christologie Luthers gedeutet?‘Lutherjahrbuch47 (1980) 71-88.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Keener, Craig S., Miracles. The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kilcrease, Jack D., The Self­Donation of God. A Contemporary Lutheran Approach to Christ and His Benefits (Eugene: Wipf and Stock, 2013).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mahlmann, Theodor, Das neue Dogma der lutherischen Christologie. Problem und Geschichte seiner Begründung (Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 1969).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Moreland, J.P., and William L.Craig, Philosophical Foundations for A Christian Worldview (Downers Grove: IVP, 2003).
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nichols, Terrence, ‘Miracles in Science and Theology’, Zygon. Journal of Religion and Science37.3 (2002) 703–716.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Pannenberg, Wolfhart, ‘The Concept of Miracle’, Zygon. Journal of Religion and Science37.3 (2002) 759–762.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Percival, Henry R., (ed.), The Seven Ecumenical Councils of The Undivided Church. Their Canons and Dogmatic Decrees, together with the Canon of All the Local Synods which have Received Ecumenical Acceptance (Oxford: James Parker/New York: Christian Literature Company, 1900).
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Pieper, Franz, Christian Dogmatics Vol 2 (St. Louis: Concordia, 1951).
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Popov, Ivan V., ‘The Idea of Deification in the Early Eastern Church’ [1909] in VladimirKharlamov (ed.), Theosis. Deification in Christian Theology (Eugene: Pickwick, 2011) 42-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Porterfield, Amanda, Healing in the History of Christianity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sánchez, Leopoldo A., Receiver, Bearer, and Giver of God’s Spirit. Jesus’ Life in the Spirit as a Lens for Theology and Life (Eugene: Pickwick, 2015).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Schmid, Heinrich, The Doctrinal Theology of the Evangelical Lutheran Church (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1961).
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Soergel, P.M., Miracles and the Protestant Imagination. The Evangelical Wonder Book in Reformation Germany (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Świeżyński, Adam, ‘The Concept of Miracle as an “Extraordinary Event”’, Roczniki Filozoficzne. Annales de philosophie60.2 (2019) 89-108
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Troeltsch, Ernst, ‘Historical and Dogmatic Method’ in ErnstTroeltsch, Religion in History (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991) 11-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ward, Keith, ‘Believing in Miracles’, Zygon. Journal of Religion and Science37.3 (2002) 741–750.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Willis, David E., Calvin’s Catholic Christology. The Function of the So­Called Extra Calvinisticum in Calvins’s Theology (Leiden: Brill, 1966).
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/EJT2025.1.004.TEIG
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error